2017
DOI: 10.1080/16184742.2017.1332668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female season ticket holders: how their satisfaction is derived differently from males

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, no-show behavior was more likely to occur if the STH was accommodated in the standing terraces, had already missed the last home match, and had already resigned. In contrast, the authors did not observe substantial gender differences in spectator no-show behavior -a finding that is largely consistent with related survey results (e.g., McDonald et al, 2017;Schreyer, 2019;Solberg & Mehus, 2014). Second, in a short, and related study employing the same data set, primarily focus on the role of geographical distance in shaping STH behavioral loyalty, adding some necessary nuance to our current understanding of the travel distance.…”
Section: What Do We Know About Spectator No-show Behavior?supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, no-show behavior was more likely to occur if the STH was accommodated in the standing terraces, had already missed the last home match, and had already resigned. In contrast, the authors did not observe substantial gender differences in spectator no-show behavior -a finding that is largely consistent with related survey results (e.g., McDonald et al, 2017;Schreyer, 2019;Solberg & Mehus, 2014). Second, in a short, and related study employing the same data set, primarily focus on the role of geographical distance in shaping STH behavioral loyalty, adding some necessary nuance to our current understanding of the travel distance.…”
Section: What Do We Know About Spectator No-show Behavior?supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Those authors in the first stream began early -perhaps often unintentionally -to document the existence of no-shows in different sporting environments, but were mostly interested in exploring related concepts, such as season ticket churn (e.g., McDonald, 2010), relationship quality (e.g., Lee et al, 2019), and satisfaction (e.g., McDonald et al, 2017). Accordingly, although most of the research generated in this stream of the literature relies on cross-sectional survey data collected on the individual level, and, thus, might help us grasp the magnitude and, perhaps, also infer the cultural robustness of the increasingly important phenomenon better, only a few studies (e.g., McDonald et al, 2017;Sampaio et al, 2015;Solberg & Mehus, 2014) add to our understanding of its potential antecedents. Further, as Karg and McDonald (2011), among others, observe, it ultimately remains questionable as to whether ticket holders, when surveyed, give an accurate indication of their -socially undesirable -no-show behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the differences between male and female fans (e.g. McDonald et al., 2017), this represents an important research perspective.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the importance of STHs for the clubs, the number of studies regarding STHs is limited and they are mostly concentrated on renewal or nonrenewal (churn) rates among STHS, analyzing factors affecting satisfaction and loyalty of STHs, and buying behaviors of STHs. McDonald [5] and McDonald et al [6] focused on nonrenewal rates among STHs, Beccarini and Ferrand [7], McDonald et al [8], Shaw and McDonald [9], McDonald et al [10] examined factors influencing STHs' satisfaction, Schreyer et al [11] predicted STH loyalty by using geographical information. The majority of the studies in the sports economics and marketing are about revealing determinants of the sports demand [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%