2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femoral Cannulation is Safe for Type A Dissection Repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
77
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
77
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Reportedly, both deep and moderate levels of hypothermia during the period of circulatory arrest have been used successfully (14)(15)(16)(17)22). Different cannulation strategies have been advocated (19,21,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Early application of the crossclamp during the cooling period has been reported (7,23), as has a clampless technique (15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Reportedly, both deep and moderate levels of hypothermia during the period of circulatory arrest have been used successfully (14)(15)(16)(17)22). Different cannulation strategies have been advocated (19,21,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Early application of the crossclamp during the cooling period has been reported (7,23), as has a clampless technique (15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall operative mortality reported by North American centers varies from 5% to 17% (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) and may improve after protocol-based management is implemented and a thoracic aortic team is assembled (30,34). Mortality associated specifically with iatrogenic acute type A dissection has been recently reported as 27% after open surgical repair and up to 33-50% after TEVAR (6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fusco et al [16], in 2004, reviewed 79 patients surgically treated for Stanford type-A acute aortic dissection, where CPB was established by femoral access. In this series, only two (2.5%) patients had unsatisfactory retrograde flow with the necessity to change the site of arterial cannulation.…”
Section: Femoral Arterymentioning
confidence: 99%