“…In the formula: x = 0, 1, …,m n : the level of the n th person's monitoring characteristic i : i th item's difficulty level Cj : j th rater's attitude Fk : The difficulty of observing k th category according to the (k-1) th category There is no limitation in the difference between the raters in the MFRM analysis; these differences are kept under control and statistics on individuals and items are calculated according to the formula (Abu Kassim, 2007). It is seen that MFRM is used in many researches about education for different purposes such as peer assessment process, the reliability of a statistics exam consisting of open-ended questions at university level, evaluation of scientific research assignments, evaluation of secondary school mathematics curriculum, evaluation of activities in science course, micro teaching practices of preservice teachers who are taking special teaching methods and examining presentation skills (Baştürk, 2010;Semerci, 2011;Batdı, 2014;Güler, 2014;Yüzüak, Yüzüak & Kaptan, 2015;Şahin, Taşdelen Teker & Güler, 2016;Kaya Uyanık, Güler, Taşdelen Teker and Demir, 2019;Köse, Usta & Yandı, 2016).…”