2008
DOI: 10.1021/ja8038689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermi Level Engineering of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by AuCl3 Doping

Abstract: We investigated the modulation of optical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) by AuCl 3 doping. The van Hove singularity transitions (E 11 (S), E 22 (S), E 11 (M)) in absorption spectroscopy disappeared gradually with an increasing doping concentration and a new peak appeared at a high doping concentration. The work function was downshifted up to 0.42 eV by a strong charge transfer from the SWCNTs to AuCl 3 by a high level of p-doping. We propose that this large work function shift forces the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

30
251
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
30
251
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, it has been reported that the redox potential difference between CNT and adsorbate is the key parameter in determining the charge-transfer direction. [85,86] The location of the work function of semiconducting and metallic CNTs, as well as the positions of the van Hove singularities of the valence and conduction band, is also strongly diameter dependent, as shown in Figure 10 a. The appropriate parameter in describing molecules is not the work function (F), but rather the redox potential.…”
Section: Chemical Dopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, it has been reported that the redox potential difference between CNT and adsorbate is the key parameter in determining the charge-transfer direction. [85,86] The location of the work function of semiconducting and metallic CNTs, as well as the positions of the van Hove singularities of the valence and conduction band, is also strongly diameter dependent, as shown in Figure 10 a. The appropriate parameter in describing molecules is not the work function (F), but rather the redox potential.…”
Section: Chemical Dopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the work function values are transformed into the redox potential using the relationship, F/e = V+4.44 V, with the redox potential being expressed with respect to the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE). [85] Using the redox potential plot, it is now possible to choose the type of adsorbates (ads). If V ads > V CNT , the electron is transferred from the CNT to the adsorbate, the CNT changes to a ptype behavior, and, therefore, the adsorbate is a p-dopant.…”
Section: Chemical Dopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14) Moreover, the G-band 12) of AuCl x @SWCNTs is significantly blue-shifted by ³20 cm ¹1 relative to that of cap-opened SWCNTs, which is consistent with previous reports; charge transfer from SWCNTs to AuCl 3 causes the blue shift of the G-band. 15,16) Figure 3 shows sequential TEM images of isolated AuCl x @SWCNTs; the images were recorded at 30 s intervals during e-beam irradiation (electron dose rate of ³1.7 © 10 6 electrons/nm 2 ·s) at room temperature. In the TEM images, a strong linear contrast inside SWCNTs, which is significantly different from that of AuCl x , is observed.…”
Section: ¹1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could have wider relevance to other fields where adsorptive doping is applied, such as in the doping of carbon nanotubes or other two dimensional materials. [19][20][21] To obtain these results, we fabricate and measure devices using CVD-grown monolayer graphene, as previously described. [22] Au/Cr (60:6 nm) electrodes in four-probe geometry, with inter-electrode distances contamination residues from graphene surface, [15] we employ two regimes: the devices are pre-annealed at < 3 × 10 −6 mbar at either 200 ˚C for 1 h or 300 ˚C for 2 hs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%