1988
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.60.1602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermion mass hierarchy from radiative corrections

Abstract: A scheme is proposed to explain the hierarchy of fermion masses. In the model presented, which has no horizontal symmetry, generations pick up masses one by one through radiative corrections as we go to higher orders in perturbation theory. An extra generation of isosinglet heavy fermions plays an important role in implementing the scheme.PACS numbers: 12.15.Ff

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second term represents the sum of the last three diagrams, and involves a 4-loop dimensionless integral ǫ (4) Υ . Although we have not calculated ǫ and ǫ…”
Section: Strange and Down Quark Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second term represents the sum of the last three diagrams, and involves a 4-loop dimensionless integral ǫ (4) Υ . Although we have not calculated ǫ and ǫ…”
Section: Strange and Down Quark Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an interesting scheme of this type [4], a pair of vectorlike fermions mix with the standard model quarks such that only the top and bottom quarks have tree-level masses. A charge −1/3 scalar then couples the third generation quarks to the other quarks, resulting in rank-two mass matrices at 1 loop and rank-three mass matrices at 2 loops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The story is similar for theories of radiative fermion mass generation [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] in which loop corrections generate the up mass from the charm mass and the charm mass from the top mass, and likewise for the quark mass mixings. In either case, these constructions increase the overall operator dimension of M (φ), and can alleviate explicit PQ violation arising from det M (φ).…”
Section: Jhep06(2010)074mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Compared with the fermion masses in the revived original LRSM, the neutrino masses are still induced by the linear seesaw, while the SM charged fermion masses additionally have a universal seesaw [50,51] contribution (the second terms in the charged fermion masses m u,d,e ). It is easy to find that for φ 1,2 = O(1 − 100 eV), χ L1,2 < ϕ = 174 GeV and χ R1,2 = O(1 − 100 TeV), the neutrino masses can naturally arrive at the sub-eV scale while the charged fermion masses should mostly come from the universal seesaw.…”
Section: A Realistic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%