2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25386-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferromagnetic soft catheter robots for minimally invasive bioprinting

Abstract: In vivo bioprinting has recently emerged as a direct fabrication technique to create artificial tissues and medical devices on target sites within the body, enabling advanced clinical strategies. However, existing in vivo bioprinting methods are often limited to applications near the skin or require open surgery for printing on internal organs. Here, we report a ferromagnetic soft catheter robot (FSCR) system capable of in situ computer-controlled bioprinting in a minimally invasive manner based on magnetic ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the preparation of LMPA based stiffness tunable materials and devices, achieving personalized customization on‐demand is an essential aspect for future applications. Therefore, further efforts should be paid in developing novel manufacturing technologies, such as 4D printing, [ 154 ] multi‐material hybrid printing, [ 155 ] and even in vivo printing [ 156 ] technology. Moreover, utilizing numerical computational assistance, [ 157 ] like machine deep learning aided structure development and optimization, may be other effective strategies to obtain more complex systems.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the preparation of LMPA based stiffness tunable materials and devices, achieving personalized customization on‐demand is an essential aspect for future applications. Therefore, further efforts should be paid in developing novel manufacturing technologies, such as 4D printing, [ 154 ] multi‐material hybrid printing, [ 155 ] and even in vivo printing [ 156 ] technology. Moreover, utilizing numerical computational assistance, [ 157 ] like machine deep learning aided structure development and optimization, may be other effective strategies to obtain more complex systems.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioprinting of muscle ink in a murine model led to functional muscle recovery, reduced fibrosis, and increased anabolic response compared to untreated injured muscle. In another study, Zhou et al (2021) used a conductive hydrogel biomaterial ink to print 3D structures onto live rat livers and post-mortem pig hearts. The advantage of using conductive biomaterial inks in bioprinting is that these materials have the potential to facilitate the propagation of electrical signals to cells; a process that is critical for cardiac and nerve regeneration (Min et al, 2018).…”
Section: Biomaterials Inksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawbacks of this technique include its high cost, and poor imaging capability of hard tissues (Mastrogiacomo et al, 2019). Zhou et al (2021) implemented computed tomography (CT) to reconstruct the surface of a rat liver pre-operation. Although CT imaging can be used to visualize soft tissues such as liver, CT is less effective compared to other techniques at differentiating soft tissues which can lead to less accurate modeling (Wood et al, 2018).…”
Section: Bedside Mounted Bioprintingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in actual clinical practice, the base of the wound is usually uneven and irregular. In-situ bioprinting is an on-site printing strategy that directly deposits cells and biomaterials on the defect after scanning morphological features of the wound after debridement [ 8 ]. 3D scanning of defect geometry dimensions makes it possible for individualized treatment of wounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%