WileySorensen, S.; Gallego Albiach, V.; Pérez Igualada, LM.; Butts, I.; Tomkiewicz, J.; Asturiano Nemesio, JF. (2013). Evaluation of methods to determine sperm density for the European eel, Anguilla anguilla. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 48 (6) flow-cytometry (FCM), using Neubauer Improved hemocytometer as benchmark.
27Initially, relationships between spermatocrit, hemocytometer counts, and sperm motility 28 were analyzed, as well as the effect of sperm dilution on hemocytometer counts.
29Furthermore, accuracy and precision of spermatocrit, applying a range of G-forces, were 30 tested and the best G-force used in method comparisons.
31We found no effect of dilution on hemocytometer sperm density estimates, whereas 32 motility associated positively with hemocytometer counts, but not with spermatocrit.
33Results from all techniques, spermatocrit, CASA and FCM, showed significant positive
Results
289Trial 1: Relationships between spermatocrit, sperm density, and motility
290Spermatocrit at 12,000 × g ranged from 12.3 to 100% and hemocytometer counts 291 ranged from 1.4 to 21.4 × 10 9 sperm mL -1 (Fig. 1). For these 43 males, there was a The CVs for CASA-1 (17.9%) and CASA-2 (28.4%) were in the order of 7.5 times 338 greater compared to the other counting techniques (CV ranges from 2.5 to 5.9%; Table 339 1). before sperm density was quantified using a hemocytometer. This study by Rakitin et al.
372(1999) used a one-step 500-fold dilution and their reported variability was high (CV =