1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf02143615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertilizer nitrogen budget in a Scots pine ecosystem attained by using root-isolated plots and15N tracer technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
1
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Plant uptake was still an important N retention mechanism, however, in an old-growth, uneven-aged forest in Washington state (Edmonds et al 1995). In some forests, N retention in understory vegetation can be significant relative to the overstory (Melin et al 1983, Mugasha and Pluth 1994, Preston and Mead 1994, Buchmann et al 1996.…”
Section: Retention In Plant Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plant uptake was still an important N retention mechanism, however, in an old-growth, uneven-aged forest in Washington state (Edmonds et al 1995). In some forests, N retention in understory vegetation can be significant relative to the overstory (Melin et al 1983, Mugasha and Pluth 1994, Preston and Mead 1994, Buchmann et al 1996.…”
Section: Retention In Plant Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest fertilization studies have shown that litter and soils are major N sinks (Heilman and Gessel 1963, Mead and Pritchett 1975, Miller et al 1976, Melin et al 1983, Raison et al 1990. Soil organic matter is the largest reservoir of N in forest ecosystems, usually exceeding 85% of total ecosystem capital (Cole and Rapp 1981).…”
Section: Retention In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though a large fraction of the N applied in fertilisation is integrated into tree biomass about two thirds remain in the soil (Melin et al 1983). One of the environmental impacts of forest fertilisation that has been debated vividly is the risk for nutrient leakage to ground water and aquatic ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the coarse roots alone in retaining N input have not been reported so far. However, Melin et al (1983) and Buchmann et al (1996) found that less than 7% of 15 N were recovered in roots (≤ 30 mm) of an old Scots pine and less than 4% in roots (< 10 mm) of a young Norway spruce forest, respectively. Schleppi et al (1999) reported that 13% of 15 N was found together in roots and litter of an old Norway spruce forest.…”
Section: N Recoveriesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Trees and ground vegetations accounted for 3% to 44% of N input, while only up to 10% of N input was leach out. In forests with higher N input, soils retained 26% to 63% of N input (Melin et al 1983, Koopmans et al 1996, Tietema et al 1998, Nadelhoffer et al 1999a, b, Schleppi et al 1999). 8% to 45% of N input was recovered in trees and vegetations, whereas leaching loss increased up to 50%.…”
Section: Distribution Of N Input Among Forest Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%