2016
DOI: 10.24033/asens.2280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feuilletages holomorphes de codimension 1: une étude locale dans le cas dicritique

Abstract: Résumé. Nous décrivons les singularités de feuilletages holomorphes dicritiques de petite multiplicité en dimension 3. En particulier nous relions l'existence de déformations et de déploiements non triviaux à des problèmes d'intégrabilité liouvillienne.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that no general degree bounds can exist for algebraic solutions, and that certain properties of singular points are relevant for establishing degree bounds in some classes. Considering dimension n ≥ 3, much work has been done in the last two decades to classify and characterize invariant surfaces; see for instance the survey [6] by Cerveau, and the work [8] by Cerveau et al on local properties. Further notable contributions concerning invariant algebraic varieties are due to Brunella and Gustavo Mendes [3], Cavalier and Lehmann [5], Corrêa and da Silva Machado [11,12], Corrêa and Jardim [10], Corrêa and Soares [13], Esteves [16], and Soares [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that no general degree bounds can exist for algebraic solutions, and that certain properties of singular points are relevant for establishing degree bounds in some classes. Considering dimension n ≥ 3, much work has been done in the last two decades to classify and characterize invariant surfaces; see for instance the survey [6] by Cerveau, and the work [8] by Cerveau et al on local properties. Further notable contributions concerning invariant algebraic varieties are due to Brunella and Gustavo Mendes [3], Cavalier and Lehmann [5], Corrêa and da Silva Machado [11,12], Corrêa and Jardim [10], Corrêa and Soares [13], Esteves [16], and Soares [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For higher dimensions Jouanolou [10] showed the existence of the general degree bound m + 1 for semi-invariants of system (1) that define smooth hypersurfaces in projective space, and Soares [21,22,23] extended and refined this result. For dimension n ≥ 3 much work has been done in the last decade to classify and characterize invariant surfaces; see for instance the survey [4] by Cerveau, and the work [6] by Cerveau et al on…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%