1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(88)80063-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibrin seal adhesive, versus nonabsorable microsuture in peripheral nerve repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
6

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
36
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In a serial electrophysiologic evaluation after section and repair of rabbit sciatic nerve using fibrin glue or suture, Moy et al 4 found that CV re c o ve ry was superior to amplitude re c o v e ry at the same analysed period. In that study, the CV recovery in the animals whose sciatics nerves were submitted to repair with fibrin adhesive was 97 to 98 % of t h e initial CV while the amplitude re c o v e ry was 40 %.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a serial electrophysiologic evaluation after section and repair of rabbit sciatic nerve using fibrin glue or suture, Moy et al 4 found that CV re c o ve ry was superior to amplitude re c o v e ry at the same analysed period. In that study, the CV recovery in the animals whose sciatics nerves were submitted to repair with fibrin adhesive was 97 to 98 % of t h e initial CV while the amplitude re c o v e ry was 40 %.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although direct suturing of the nerve is considered the standard procedure, it can be difficult due to reduced nerve caliber and sometimes can cause inflammatory reaction impairing the axonal re g e n e r a t i o n 1 . The repair with fibrin glue is an alternative to the conventional suture technique, although there is no definitive experimental evaluation of the two techniques [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . In this study we compared the parameters obtained in the electrophysiologic evaluation in thre e d i ff e rent repairs techniques after the section of the rat sciatic nerve, trying to define which one allows better nerve regeneration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group with the worst results was the suture alone group (S), especially compared to the MDP-treated group (SFM) at weeks 8 and 12. As some investigators have speculated, neurorrhaphy could hinder nerve regeneration in several ways: by escalating the inflammatory response at the repair point, by causing deviations in the path of those axons otherwise aiming towards the distal segment of the nerve (10), by temporarily reducing blood flow through the microcirculation (11), and via the formation of mechanical obstructions such as scar tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Very few attempts have been made to connect torn nerves by microsuture. [2][3][4] Even when such attempts were made, they were rarely successful, because, unlike peripheral nerves, 5 cauda equina nerve roots lacked perineurium to hold the sutured ends securely together. In view of the poor neurological recovery with both of the above-mentioned approaches, particularly in complete injuries, attempt was made by the authors to find a better method of anastomosis to improve outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%