1982
DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(82)90058-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibrous pseudotumor of testicular tunic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since an early reference to a case of a peritesticular fibromatous mass by Sir Astley Cooper in 1830 and a case report by Balloch in 1904, 1,2 various case reports and small series have been published in the urology, pathology, and radiology literature. [2][3][4][5][6] Multiple other names have been applied to this and related entities, including chronic proliferative periorchitis, fibromatous periorchitis, pseudofibromatous periorchitis, reactive periorchitis, an inflammatory pseudotumor, nodular and diffuse fibrous proliferation of the tunica, a benign fibrous paratesticular tumor, granulomatous periorchitis, nonspecific peritesticular fibrosis, a nodular fibropseudotumor, and proliferative funiculitis, [7][8][9][10][11] partly reflecting the variable and overlapping spectrum of pathologic findings and various etiologic theories. Although the terminology, classification, and proposed pathogenesis have been confusing and controversial, these lesions are generally accepted to represent a benign reactive proliferation of inflammatory and fibrous tissue, likely in response to trauma, surgery, infection, or inflammation, as distinct from true benign fibrous neoplasms, which may also rarely occur in the testis and testicular tunics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since an early reference to a case of a peritesticular fibromatous mass by Sir Astley Cooper in 1830 and a case report by Balloch in 1904, 1,2 various case reports and small series have been published in the urology, pathology, and radiology literature. [2][3][4][5][6] Multiple other names have been applied to this and related entities, including chronic proliferative periorchitis, fibromatous periorchitis, pseudofibromatous periorchitis, reactive periorchitis, an inflammatory pseudotumor, nodular and diffuse fibrous proliferation of the tunica, a benign fibrous paratesticular tumor, granulomatous periorchitis, nonspecific peritesticular fibrosis, a nodular fibropseudotumor, and proliferative funiculitis, [7][8][9][10][11] partly reflecting the variable and overlapping spectrum of pathologic findings and various etiologic theories. Although the terminology, classification, and proposed pathogenesis have been confusing and controversial, these lesions are generally accepted to represent a benign reactive proliferation of inflammatory and fibrous tissue, likely in response to trauma, surgery, infection, or inflammation, as distinct from true benign fibrous neoplasms, which may also rarely occur in the testis and testicular tunics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many terms have been used to describe this entity, including pseudofibromatous periorchitis, inflammatory pseudotumor, benign fibrous tumor, chronic proliferative periorchitis, and multiple fihromata. There is a debate as to whether this entity represents an inflammatory or neoplastic process [1,2], with a third opinion from Mostofi and Price [3] M.L. Grebenc et al: Fibrous pseudotumor of the tunica vaginalis testis who regard it as a non-neoplastic fibrous proliferation, preferring the term fibrous pseudotumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, a history of trauma is difficult to establish. Sajjad et al [9] also thought that a relationship with an inflammatory process (epididymitis, previous surgery, infected hydro cele. trauma, etc.)…”
Section: Hinman and Gibsonmentioning
confidence: 99%