2008
DOI: 10.3137/ao.460202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field accuracy of Canadian rain measurements

Abstract: Daily historical rain-gauge data from several Canadian sources and field experiments were compared to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) pit gauge rainfall measurements in order to determine the accuracies for different operational rain gauges. The detailed technical description of the main Canadian precipitation gauges assisted in understanding the associated accuracies and the need for adjustments for rain-gauge errors. All gauges, including the pit gauge, reported less than the actual rainfall. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on tipping bucket rain gauges have observed extensive underestimation of rainfall amounts (of up to 50%), primarily due to acceleration of airflow over the top of the gauge, with other error sources including splashing, and the finite time required for the buckets to reset in between tips during heavy rain (e.g., Devine and Mekis, 2008;Duchon and Biddle, 2010). An empirical correction was applied to the Nordic data to account for wind effects, following the work on a similar gauge by Mekonnen et al (2015).…”
Section: Rainfall Undercatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on tipping bucket rain gauges have observed extensive underestimation of rainfall amounts (of up to 50%), primarily due to acceleration of airflow over the top of the gauge, with other error sources including splashing, and the finite time required for the buckets to reset in between tips during heavy rain (e.g., Devine and Mekis, 2008;Duchon and Biddle, 2010). An empirical correction was applied to the Nordic data to account for wind effects, following the work on a similar gauge by Mekonnen et al (2015).…”
Section: Rainfall Undercatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal conductivity of air, snowfall ). An investigation of rainfall measurements at Egbert, Ontario (Devine and Mekis, 2008), showed a catch ratio of 95 % for the Geonor-SA relative to a pit gauge, the WMO reference for rainfall intercomparison (WMO, 1969). Thus, we adjusted all rainfall measurements using the average catch efficiency of 95 % (CE = 0.95).…”
Section: Correcting For Geonor-sa Undercatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hourly rainfall amounts measured by the tipping bucket rainfall gauge (TBRG) observation network were used to produce the heavy rainfall indices (details on the TBRG instrument characteristics can be found in Devine and Mekis (2008) and Shephard et al (2014)). All data were retrieved from the National Climate Archive of the Meteorological Service of Canada (MSC) (Government of Canada, 2015a).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%