2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jher.2016.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field and theoretical investigation of sediment mass fluxes on an accretional coastal mudflat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Soulsby (), the wave friction coefficient f wr depends on the hydraulic regime, and can be expressed as fwr={|left2Rew0.5 , Rew105|normallnormalanormalmnormalinormalnnormalanormalr 0.0521Rew0.187 , Rew>105true(smooth turbulenttrue) 0.237 r0.52, true(rough turbulenttrue) where Rewfalse(=Ûδ Aδvfalse) is the wave Reynolds number and r (= Aδks) is the relative roughness. Based on the recommendations of Davies and Thorne () and Shi et al (), the equivalent bed roughness was estimated from k s = 25 η 2 /λ (Davies & Thorne, ), where η is the ripple height and λ is the ripple wavelength. The ripple heights and wavelengths, measured by a ruler during bed exposure after ebb, ranged from 1.5 to 2.3 cm and 5.5 to 7.4 cm, respectively (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on Soulsby (), the wave friction coefficient f wr depends on the hydraulic regime, and can be expressed as fwr={|left2Rew0.5 , Rew105|normallnormalanormalmnormalinormalnnormalanormalr 0.0521Rew0.187 , Rew>105true(smooth turbulenttrue) 0.237 r0.52, true(rough turbulenttrue) where Rewfalse(=Ûδ Aδvfalse) is the wave Reynolds number and r (= Aδks) is the relative roughness. Based on the recommendations of Davies and Thorne () and Shi et al (), the equivalent bed roughness was estimated from k s = 25 η 2 /λ (Davies & Thorne, ), where η is the ripple height and λ is the ripple wavelength. The ripple heights and wavelengths, measured by a ruler during bed exposure after ebb, ranged from 1.5 to 2.3 cm and 5.5 to 7.4 cm, respectively (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coastal hydrodynamics are influenced by a large radial sand‐ridge system in the southern Yellow Sea off the Jiangsu coast, and characterized by a radial current field and high turbidity due to abundant sediment supply from the Yangtze River estuary and the abandoned Yellow River mouth (e.g., Shi et al, ; Wang, ; Zhang et al, ).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 6 MHz Nortek acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV), i.e., vector, was used to record the near-bed 3-D velocity and intratidal bed-level changes and was set up in autonomous mode at 16 Hz in 5 min bursts (4096 Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 10.1002/2016JC011902 points per 5 min time series), with its probe installed at a height of 0.22 m above the bed ( Figure 2). The ADV can measure not only the boundary 3-D velocity but also intratidal bed-level changes [Salehi and Strom, 2012;Shi et al, 2015Shi et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increased human activity, such as river damming [e.g., Xu et al, 2006;Yang et al, 2007;Dai et al, 2011Dai et al, , 2013 and large-scale land reclamation [e.g., French et al, 2000;Chung et al, 2004;Wang and Gao, 2012], intertidal mudflats are subject to tremendous pressure and even complete removal in some regions of the world [Gornitz et al, 1994;Chen and Chen, 2002;Yang et al, 2005Yang et al, , 2011Abuodha and Woodroffe, 2006]. Nonlinear interactions between tidal currents and wind waves control sediment erosion, deposition, transport, and mixing processes [Janssen-Stelder, 2000;Herman et al, 2001;Shi, 2012;Shi et al, 2016] and are directly responsible for the morphological development of intertidal mudflats [Widdows et al, 2008;Hunt et al, 2015]. However, it is not clear how these interactions result in morphological change on intertidal mudflats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However at other sites, tidal currents have been shown to have a greater impact on landward sediment transport than wave activity (Janssen-Stelder, 2000;Zhu et al, 2014). Furthermore, some studies have emphasized the importance of longshore and cross-shore sediment advection for SSC and tidal mudflat topography (Wang et al, 2012;Shi et al, 2016). However, these advection terms have been shown to be most pronounced in the lower (seaward) parts of tidal mudflats (Le Hir et al, 2000;Wang et al, 2012), with wind and current-induced sediment resuspension becoming more important towards the upper (landward) part of the tidal mudflat (Green, 2011;Ma et al, 2018).…”
Section: Drivers Of Intertidal Sediment Resuspensionmentioning
confidence: 99%