2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2014000800006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field data and prediction models of pesticide spray drift on coffee crop

Abstract: -The objective of this work was to generate drift curves from pesticide applications on coffee plants and to compare them with two European drift-prediction models. The used methodology is based on the ISO 22866 standard. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with ten replicates in a 2x20 split-plot arrangement. The evaluated factors were: two types of nozzles (hollow cone with and without air induction) and 20 parallel distances to the crop line outside of the target area, spaced at 2.5 m. B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, for all studied conditions, drift decreased exponentially as downwind distance from the nozzle increased. Drift distributions have been based on a potential function by Alves and Cunha (2014), Ganzelmeier et al (1995), and Meli et al (2003); on a four-parameter exponential decay function by Holterman and van de Zande (2003); and on a logistic function by Koger et al (2005). One type of function cannot be generalized for all conditions, as seen in the drift data shown here, which are variable and dependent on the physicochemical properties of the spray solution, nozzle type and orifice size, wind speed, and location of the study (wind tunnel, bench or field).
Figure 5 Percent drift in dicamba (dic) and dicamba plus glyphosate (dic+gly) applications made using four different nozzle types in two experimental runs.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for all studied conditions, drift decreased exponentially as downwind distance from the nozzle increased. Drift distributions have been based on a potential function by Alves and Cunha (2014), Ganzelmeier et al (1995), and Meli et al (2003); on a four-parameter exponential decay function by Holterman and van de Zande (2003); and on a logistic function by Koger et al (2005). One type of function cannot be generalized for all conditions, as seen in the drift data shown here, which are variable and dependent on the physicochemical properties of the spray solution, nozzle type and orifice size, wind speed, and location of the study (wind tunnel, bench or field).
Figure 5 Percent drift in dicamba (dic) and dicamba plus glyphosate (dic+gly) applications made using four different nozzle types in two experimental runs.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Droplet size, droplet velocity, leaf surface structure (waxy or hairy), the chemical composition of the spray solution, and meteorological conditions (air temperature, wind velocity, and relative humidity) may greatly influence the coverage area and consequently control of weeds, diseases, mites, and insects. The proper ASA used in the pesticide tank mix may contribute to improving the performance of the application (Alves & Cunha, 2014;Sasaki et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drift is considered one of the biggest problems of agriculture, and it can be defined as the trajectory deviation that prevents the produced droplets to hit the target, a fact that is mainly related to the droplet size and wind speed (CHECHETTO et al, 2013;ALVES & CUNHA, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%