2014
DOI: 10.1080/02772248.2014.980130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field dissipation and health hazard assessment of Fenhexamid on Egyptian grapes

Abstract: Dissipation behavior and hazard assessment of the fungicide fenhexamid applied to grapes were investigated under climatic conditions in Egypt. Fenhexamid residues were extracted from grape samples with ethyl acetate. The extract was cleaned up by QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe) method, and determined by gas chromatographic method (GC-mECD). The average recoveries ranged between 94.2% and 99.4% with associated relative standard deviation not exceeding 12%. The estimated limit of quant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar t 1/2 to that found in our results was observed in a study of the dissipation rate of methomyl in cabbage and tomato (Othman et al, 1987), although studies made in grape showed a higher t 1/2 than ours (Kaushik et al, 2006). Diff erent species, weather conditions, the physical and chemical properties of pesticides, method and rate of application may be responsible for the diff erent dissipation rates of this compound (Romeh and Mekky, 2009;Malhat et al, 2012bMalhat et al, , 2014c. In the fi eld, besides the eff ect of some physical and chemical factors such as light, heat, pH and moisture (Agnihothrudu and Muraleedharan, 1990;Chen et al, 1987;Cosby et al, 1972;Miller and Donaldson, 1994;Malhat, 2012) on the degradation of pesticides, growth dilution factor might play a signifi cant role in the degradation of methomyl residues (Agnihothrudu and Muraleedharan, 1990; Bisen and Ghosh Hajara, 2000;Chen and Wan, 1988;Khay et al, 2008;Cabras et al, 1990, Malhat, 2013.…”
Section: Dissipation Behaviour In Tomatomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar t 1/2 to that found in our results was observed in a study of the dissipation rate of methomyl in cabbage and tomato (Othman et al, 1987), although studies made in grape showed a higher t 1/2 than ours (Kaushik et al, 2006). Diff erent species, weather conditions, the physical and chemical properties of pesticides, method and rate of application may be responsible for the diff erent dissipation rates of this compound (Romeh and Mekky, 2009;Malhat et al, 2012bMalhat et al, , 2014c. In the fi eld, besides the eff ect of some physical and chemical factors such as light, heat, pH and moisture (Agnihothrudu and Muraleedharan, 1990;Chen et al, 1987;Cosby et al, 1972;Miller and Donaldson, 1994;Malhat, 2012) on the degradation of pesticides, growth dilution factor might play a signifi cant role in the degradation of methomyl residues (Agnihothrudu and Muraleedharan, 1990; Bisen and Ghosh Hajara, 2000;Chen and Wan, 1988;Khay et al, 2008;Cabras et al, 1990, Malhat, 2013.…”
Section: Dissipation Behaviour In Tomatomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dietary risk is considered within the acceptable risk for human health if HQ < 1 and TMDI < MPI. However, HQ > 1 represents a higher risk to consumers (Ludwicki et al, 2015; Malhat et al, 2014). HQ0.25em()%goodbreak=EDIADIgoodbreak×100 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ADI was considered 0.02 mg/ kg bw (body weight) for cypermethrin and 0.03 mg/kg bw for Profenofos (CODEX alimentarius, 2020). Health risk index more than 1 is considered as unsafe for human health (Darko and Akoto, 2008;Malhat et al, 2014) and Health Index (HI) <100% represents an acceptable risk to human health (Malhat et al, 2017;Qin et al, 2020).…”
Section: Health Risk Index (Hri)mentioning
confidence: 99%