1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(99)00056-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field emission energy distributions from individual multiwalled carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
119
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They move to the left with increasing extraction bias as a result of field penetration, which lowers the potential energy at the apex of the nanotube as well as its mean value in the whole nanotube. Similar displacements have been observed experimentally with carbon emitters [3,21]. The peaks tend to the positions observed in distribution of incident states at z=O.…”
Section: Field Emission From An Open (55) Carbon Nanotubesupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They move to the left with increasing extraction bias as a result of field penetration, which lowers the potential energy at the apex of the nanotube as well as its mean value in the whole nanotube. Similar displacements have been observed experimentally with carbon emitters [3,21]. The peaks tend to the positions observed in distribution of incident states at z=O.…”
Section: Field Emission From An Open (55) Carbon Nanotubesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Like other forms of nanostructured carbon, the nanotubes [1][2][3] show interesting fieldemission properties such as low extracting field, high current density, and seemingly long operating time. In general, the current-voltage characteristics of the nanotubes are found to follow a Fowler-Nordheim type tunneling law [4] with an emitter work function varying between 4 to 5 eV depending on the type of nanotubes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mostly this will lead to an underestimation of the brightness. The method used by Fransen et al 4 and de Jonge 5 offers the best chance of giving the real value of the geometrical source size and thus the brightness. For an emitter as analyzed by Hata et al 2 even the definition of brightness is a problem.…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively narrow energy electron emission peaks from carbon nanotubes have been reported which may be of use in a vacuum based device. 45 Since the DOS in the reservoirs fixes the number of electrons available for transport in a certain energy range in ballistic devices, the reduction of power in narrow transmission probability devices, with only modest gains in electronic efficiency, is expected to be undesirable in the presence of phonon heat leaks. It is likely that the best way to simultaneously achieve high electronic efficiency and high power in a ballistic device is to design the structure such that the transmission probability rises sharply from zero to one and remains close to unity beyond this.…”
Section: A Ballistic Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%