2003
DOI: 10.1021/es034039q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Evaluation of the Solvent Extraction Residual Biotreatment Technology

Abstract: The Solvent Extraction Residual Biotreatment (SERB) technology was evaluated at a former dry cleaner site in Jacksonville, FL, where an area of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) contamination was identified. The SERB technology is a treatmenttrain approach for complete site restoration, which combines an active in situ dense nonaqueous-phase liquid (DNAPL) removal technology, cosolvent extraction, with a passive enhanced in situ bioremediation technology, reductive dechlorination. During the in situ cosolvent extracti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The very low current demands of the microbial process could readily be supplied by solar panels, providing a sustainable bioremediation option. Although G. lovleyi dehalogenates PCE only to cis-DCE, conversion of PCE to cis-DCE near source zones can be very effective for enhanced PCE dissolution, and there can be subsequent treatment of the more soluble compound cis-DCE with more traditional bioremediation strategies (3,4,21). Furthermore, the finding that G. lovleyi directly accepts electrons from graphite electrodes for reductive dechlorination suggests that other organisms capable of complete dechlorination of PCE or dechlorination of other environmental contaminants might be enriched with electrodes serving as the electron donor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The very low current demands of the microbial process could readily be supplied by solar panels, providing a sustainable bioremediation option. Although G. lovleyi dehalogenates PCE only to cis-DCE, conversion of PCE to cis-DCE near source zones can be very effective for enhanced PCE dissolution, and there can be subsequent treatment of the more soluble compound cis-DCE with more traditional bioremediation strategies (3,4,21). Furthermore, the finding that G. lovleyi directly accepts electrons from graphite electrodes for reductive dechlorination suggests that other organisms capable of complete dechlorination of PCE or dechlorination of other environmental contaminants might be enriched with electrodes serving as the electron donor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a staged treatment scenario, the physicochemical remedy removes significant contaminant mass, and, in case of surfactant or co-solvent flushing, delivers electron donors that may stimulate microbial reductive dechlorination activity (Mravik et al 2003;Ramakrishnan et al 2005). Hence, in this sequential approach, reductive dechlorination acts as a "polishing" step that detoxifies residual contaminants, thereby reducing contaminant mass flux and controlling long-term plume development.…”
Section: Ii12 Effects Of Tween 80 On Microbial Reductive Dechlorinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past two decades, numerous remediation technologies have been developed to treat DNAPL source zones; however, the ability of a single technology to completely remove or destroy all DNAPL mass and reduce dissolved-phase contaminant concentrations below drinking water standards is limited. Among potential in situ remediation technologies, microbial reductive dechlorination has emerged as an attractive DNAPL source zone remedy (Da Silva et al, 2006;Sleep et al, 2006;Schaefer et al, 2010), and as a source zone polishing step to control residual contaminant concentrations following aggressive physicochemical treatment (Mravik et al, 2003;Ramsburg et al, 2004;Christ et al, 2005). During source zone bioremediation, microbial activity lowers dissolved-phase contaminant concentrations, thereby increasing the driving force for contaminant dissolution from the DNAPL to the aqueous phase, a process commonly referred to as bioenhanced dissolution (Yang and McCarty, 2000;Cope and Hughes, 2001;Yang and McCarty, 2002;Adamson et al, 2003;Sleep et al, 2006;Glover et al, 2007;4 Amos et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%