2012
DOI: 10.1177/1094428112462608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Experiments on Sensitive Organizational Topics

Abstract: Organizational scholars study a number of sensitive topics that make employees and organizations vulnerable to unfavorable views. However, the typical ways in which researchers study these topics-via laboratory experiments and field surveys-can be laden with problems. In this article, the authors argue that the difficulties in studying sensitive topics can be overcome through the underutilized method of field experiments, detail strategies for conducting high-quality experimental field studies, and offer sugge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we tried to reduce the confounding effects by including variables that control for influences on the individual level, we cannot preclude that these findings are biased by unobserved variables. To test for a causal relationship between external wage disparities and individual performance, we recommend field experiments (see, e.g., King et al 2013), which have the advantage of high internal and external validity.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we tried to reduce the confounding effects by including variables that control for influences on the individual level, we cannot preclude that these findings are biased by unobserved variables. To test for a causal relationship between external wage disparities and individual performance, we recommend field experiments (see, e.g., King et al 2013), which have the advantage of high internal and external validity.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite important methodological reflections in research in the area (Aguinis & Vandenberg, 2014;Hoon, 2013;King, Hebl, Morgan, & Ahmad, 2012), the hegemony of the report almost implies that we abandon Doing, and especially the relation between Saying and Doing when individual and/or collective phenomena are studied in the world of work. Hence, research in WOP seems to be exclusively focused on apprehending the phenomenon through communication, with limited emphasis on observation (Aguinis et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, future research should test our model with longitudinal designs across multiple occupations that track the managerial tactics summarized in Figure as individuals progress through the recruitment/selection, socialization, and “veteran” phases, along with individuals' responses to these tactics. This could involve field experiments or quasi‐experiments that assessed the efficacy of tactics, whether singly, as subsets, or as a holistic set (Grant & Wall, ; King, Hebl, Morgan, & Ahmad, ). Perhaps the most feasible approach would be to assess the recruitment/selection, socialization, and “veteran” phases independently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%