1988
DOI: 10.1021/ac00168a717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field-Flow Fractionation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This report describes the use of CE for rapid, sensitive resolution of polystyrene nanospheres ranging from 39 to 683 nm in diameter. These separations appear to be based upon capillary wall-particle interactions iatki than predicted electrophoretic mechanisms; yet resolution is superior to that observed using other elution techniques (11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This report describes the use of CE for rapid, sensitive resolution of polystyrene nanospheres ranging from 39 to 683 nm in diameter. These separations appear to be based upon capillary wall-particle interactions iatki than predicted electrophoretic mechanisms; yet resolution is superior to that observed using other elution techniques (11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Field flow fractionation (FFF) separates molecules by applying a perpendicular parabolic flow to the sample in a narrow channel. There are four main configurations of fields in FFF-sedimentation, thermal, hydraulic (or flow), and electrical-where the "field" describes the environment in which the particles are separated (Caldwell, 1988). For the separation of whey protein, in native or soluble aggregate form, hydraulic (sometimes known as flow, or asymmetric flow) separation is most applicable.…”
Section: Field Flow Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 99%