2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.12.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field-flow fractionation of nano- and microparticles in rotating coiled columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…sdFFF can effectively separate particles based on size, volume, mass and density with respect to the mobile phase [9]. It has the power and resolution to separate particles from 1nm to ~50μm in size, and effectively separated nano and microparticles such as dust, silica beads, sand and soil particles, achieved by simply changing the flow rate [10], offering an intriguing opportunity for virus and phage separation.…”
Section: Countercurrent Chromatography and Field-flow Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…sdFFF can effectively separate particles based on size, volume, mass and density with respect to the mobile phase [9]. It has the power and resolution to separate particles from 1nm to ~50μm in size, and effectively separated nano and microparticles such as dust, silica beads, sand and soil particles, achieved by simply changing the flow rate [10], offering an intriguing opportunity for virus and phage separation.…”
Section: Countercurrent Chromatography and Field-flow Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No areas of lysis or plaques were seen for fraction number 26 on the dilution gradient, but given the area of lysis present on the initial spot test for this fraction (data not shown), this would suggest a concentration of phages in the fraction of less than 10 5 PFU/ml. The concentration gradient revealed that the initial concentration of the phage solution was ~10 10 , when calculating for dilutions. As with the T4 samples, the areas of lysis were indeed caused by phage, shown by observing areas of lysis in samples propagated from positive spots.…”
Section: ϕX174mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…131 In FFF sample fractionation is performed inside a trapezoidal channel without a stationary phase and is the only technique that offers a continuous, high size-resolution fractionation from about 1 nm up to several µm. 39 Briefly, most of the FFF subtechniques comprise channel dimensions of 20-50 cm length, 2-3 cm width and 0.01-0.05 cm in thickness; 132 (alternatively, and mentioned for the sake of completeness, FFF in rotating coiled columns has also been described in few studies 133,134,135,136 ). A pumped carrier liquid is moving the analytes/particles from the "inlet side" to the "outlet/detector side" generating a parabolic flow profile.…”
Section: Field-flow Fractionation (Fff) -General Concept and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Обычно скорость вращения центрифуги составляет около 2 500 об / мин, однако, для увеличения разрешения между фракциями частиц разных размеров и расширения их диапазона можно воспользоваться предусмотренным градиентным уменьшением скорости вращения. Метод достаточно удобен и даже позволяет нарабатывать небольшие количества отдельных фракций для их дальнейшего анализа лабораторными методами, что полезно при отработке технологий создания определенных наночастиц или при исследованиях сложных природных объектов, например, илистых отложений или образцов, отобранных из окру жающего воздуха [12]. Для биомолекул -это в первую очередь метод исследования агрегации, так как центробежные силы, равно как и асимметричные потоки, не оказывают никакого действия на самые неустойчивые агрегаты [13].…”
Section: том 9 № 1 2019unclassified