“…On the other hand, D S is determined by the local (single-ion) anisotropy parameters D i and hence the increase of single-ion anisotropy can be regarded as the most suitable strategy for the increase of U eff . This allows even mononuclear complexes behaving as SMMs (i.e., SIMs) to be obtained, provided that the single-ion anisotropy is high enough. − For this reason, the control of axial magnetic anisotropy is under thorough research interest in the field of molecular magnetism. ,, Magnetic anisotropy of mononuclear compounds is the property influenced by multiple factors such as nature of the metal ion, shape of the coordination polyhedron, ligand-field (LF) strength, spin–orbit coupling (SOC), spin–spin coupling, and so forth, thus making design, control, and fine-tuning of magnetic anisotropy a really challenging goal. ,,− Among 3d ions, the most promising candidates for SIMs are coordination compounds of the high-spin Co(II) ions with d 7 electronic configuration. , Though the largest value of U eff has been so far achieved for highly unstable low coordinate Co(II) complexes, ,, it was shown that much more chemically stable hepta- ,− and hexacoordinate − compounds are still promising for building up magnetic anisotropy of Co(II)-based SIMs by means of a proper ligand design. One of the strategies of fine-tuning magnetic anisotropy is to isolate the LF influence on the d-type atomic orbitals (d-AOs) of a certain symmetry to have the possibility to adjust d-AO’s energy and splitting pattern.…”