2016
DOI: 10.1080/14680629.2016.1250666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field investigation on the lateral resistance of railway tracks including hot mix asphalt layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30,31 Similarly, the longitudinal spring constants were selected over a wide range of 5–30 MPa. This choice was deemed reasonable based on measured force–displacement behavior during sleeper pullout tests 18 from which longitudinal spring constants in the range of 6–13 MPa were extracted. Additionally, in connection with track resistance to longitudinal displacement, similar values are mentioned in the UIC Code dealing with track–bridge interactions.…”
Section: Analysis Of Track Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30,31 Similarly, the longitudinal spring constants were selected over a wide range of 5–30 MPa. This choice was deemed reasonable based on measured force–displacement behavior during sleeper pullout tests 18 from which longitudinal spring constants in the range of 6–13 MPa were extracted. Additionally, in connection with track resistance to longitudinal displacement, similar values are mentioned in the UIC Code dealing with track–bridge interactions.…”
Section: Analysis Of Track Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resistance may be inferior compared to a ballasted track where crib and shoulder ballast also contribute to the sliding resistance. 18,19 Analyzing track responses due to braking is also warranted in view of advances in braking systems. The traditional method of slowing or completely stopping trains involves clamping of the wheels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%