1969
DOI: 10.3133/pp562g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field measurement of the initiation of large bed particle motion in Blue Creek near Klamath, California

Abstract: More than two-thirds of the field measurements of bed velocity necessary to initiate motion of coarse natural particles whose size, shape, specific gravity, and orientation angle were known agree within 20 percent of those velocities predicted from theory. The theory is based on balancing turning moments of the fluid forces of drag and lift with the resisting moment of the submerged particle weight. Initial motion seems to depend more on size and shape than on specific gravity or orientation angle. In fact, sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The karstification and fracturation degree of sloping rocky coasts conditions the value of the Manning number to become approximately 0.052. In the coastal area of Apulia, in the proximity of the studied areas, there is a considerable variation in local roughness, hence these areas have been subdivided in fixed buffers with a constant length and inland depth: the buffers in Torre Squillace are 25 m × 90 m, while in Torre Sant'Emiliano are 100 m × 300 m. This is an approximation useful to simulate open channel flow (Manning, 1891;Helley, 1969). The percentage of land and soil utilisation, inside every buffer, has been assessed by using the Corine Land Cover 2000 land-use class features (European Commission, 1994) in order to obtain the mean evaluation of the Manning number.…”
Section: Tsunami Floodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The karstification and fracturation degree of sloping rocky coasts conditions the value of the Manning number to become approximately 0.052. In the coastal area of Apulia, in the proximity of the studied areas, there is a considerable variation in local roughness, hence these areas have been subdivided in fixed buffers with a constant length and inland depth: the buffers in Torre Squillace are 25 m × 90 m, while in Torre Sant'Emiliano are 100 m × 300 m. This is an approximation useful to simulate open channel flow (Manning, 1891;Helley, 1969). The percentage of land and soil utilisation, inside every buffer, has been assessed by using the Corine Land Cover 2000 land-use class features (European Commission, 1994) in order to obtain the mean evaluation of the Manning number.…”
Section: Tsunami Floodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied boulder-specific values for C d , coefficient of drag (Table 2), by calculating boulder-specific shape factors (Corey, 1949) and taking the appropriate C d values from Fig. 3 in Helley (1969), as suggested by Noormets et al (2004). For C l , coefficient of lift, we used 0.178 according to previous studies (e.g.…”
Section: Calculation Of Flow Velocities For Block and Boulder Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3), maximum significant wave heights of ∼ 4-5 m and ∼ 5-6 m are inferred for site ESA and for Hernani, respectively, from the Delft3D model pre- a -V abc of ESA 9 was corrected to V DGPS using a conservative value of 0.6, which was empirically calculated for the similarly shaped boulder ESA 7; b -Corey shape factor and appropriate C d values according to Corey (1949), Helley (1969: Fig. 3), and Komar and Reimers (1978).…”
Section: Storm Surge and Wave Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drag force is given by (Bradley and Mears, 1980), where the drag coefficient, C D =1.95, has been taken from the graph given in Fig. 3 in Helley (1969) based on the shape factor. A n is the area of the particle projected normal to the flow, q f is mass of unit volume of the water, and u is flow velocity.…”
Section: Estimate Of Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major changes in the megaclast locations on the platform could be recognized, however. Megaclasts were rearranged between 1940and 1950, 1952and 1962, and 1969and 1971(Noormets et al, 2002. Although relocation of single megaclasts is obvious at various times, the group as whole has remained relatively stable.…”
Section: Wave Climate and Megaclast Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%