2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7952(02)00182-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field measurements of shear strength of an underconsolidated marine clay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…excess pore pressure; see above), s n ¼ total vertical stress, and N kt ¼ the empirical cone factor. N kt has been established from laboratory-based undrained shear strength and corrected cone resistance testing (Karakouzian et al, 2003), and ranges between 8 and 30 for fine-grained cohesive sediments (see summary Lunne et al, 1997, Ch. 5.4.2.1).…”
Section: Cptu (Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…excess pore pressure; see above), s n ¼ total vertical stress, and N kt ¼ the empirical cone factor. N kt has been established from laboratory-based undrained shear strength and corrected cone resistance testing (Karakouzian et al, 2003), and ranges between 8 and 30 for fine-grained cohesive sediments (see summary Lunne et al, 1997, Ch. 5.4.2.1).…”
Section: Cptu (Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in situ S u derived from q c , agrees well with the lab vane shear (Figures 3b and 3c), whereas in situ measurements using the vane shear probe are significantly lower (<8 kPa in the glacial clay; Figure 3a). The discrepancy between in situ vane shear and CPT data may be partly explained by a general underestimation of the first caused by the pre‐disturbance of the sediment by the insertion of the device before shearing and, moreover, by uncertainties when choosing the empirical factor N k for calculating S u from CPT data [ Karakouzian et al , 2003]. However, an overall increase in strength in the lower unit can be observed regardless of the method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Underconsolidated sediments refer to those that are not sufficiently consolidated under the overburden pressure and contain EPWP. 39 This phenomenon possibly occurs due to (1) rapid deposition and impermeable property of the sediments (clay and diatomaceous ooze rich), 38 (2) the increase of pore water content caused by dissociation of hydrate, (3) the presence of hydrate veins that increases the strength of the sediments and supports the overburden pressure, and (4) creep or secondary consolidation. It has great importance to understand the mechanical characteristics of underconsolidated sediments because underconsolidated sediments can affect the stability of the seabed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%