1998
DOI: 10.1515/crll.1998.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fields of definition of p-adic covers

Abstract: This paper concerns fields of definition and fields of moduli of G-Galois covers of the line over p-adic fields, and more generally over henselian discrete valuation fields. We show that the field of moduli of a p-adic cover will be a field of definition provided that the residue characteristic p does not divide |G| and that the branch points do not coalesce modulo p (or in the more general case, that the branch locus is smooth on the special fibre). Hence if p does not divide |G|, then a G-Galois cover of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last corollary conjoins Corollary 1.3 above and results of Dèbes-Harbater [7] and Emsalem [9]. We assume here that the base space B is a curve.…”
Section: Applicationssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The last corollary conjoins Corollary 1.3 above and results of Dèbes-Harbater [7] and Emsalem [9]. We assume here that the base space B is a curve.…”
Section: Applicationssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…It can be shown then that if K is the field of moduli of the (G-)cover f , then K v is a field of definition of f for all good places v of K; the result was proved for G-covers of P 1 in [7] and generalized in [9]. We obtain Corollary 1.4.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this direction the following can be obtained from [7] and [10]. The same holds if the residue characteristic does not divide the order of Aut(X) and if the branch locus of the cover X → X/Aut(X) is smooth at v. From results of Fulton [12], these assumptions ensure that X has k ur v -good reduction (a fortiori k ur v -stable reduction) with respect to k v .…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Also, under (GR0), the field of moduli of a G-cover with general base B is a field of definition (see [Ems99], which generalizes [DH98]). Hence theorem 2.1 is the special case of theorem 2.6 with B = P 1 and the good reduction assumption ensured by (GR0).…”
Section: Torsion Of Abelian Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%