2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4052720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Figurines and Doyennes: The Selection of Female Ministers in Autocracies and Democracies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
5

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
4
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Loyalty as the main criterion for career advancement points to a pattern in political systems that heavily rely on coercion for their survival (see also Scharp and Gläßel, 2020). This strategy, which generally disenfranchises women, tilts the balance towards men who are perceived “readily available to occupy positions based on credible threats” (Nyrup et al, 2023: 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Loyalty as the main criterion for career advancement points to a pattern in political systems that heavily rely on coercion for their survival (see also Scharp and Gläßel, 2020). This strategy, which generally disenfranchises women, tilts the balance towards men who are perceived “readily available to occupy positions based on credible threats” (Nyrup et al, 2023: 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, voters supposedly hold negative stereotypes towards women (Bateson, 2020). Second, because women as a group do not represent a major threat to regimes survival, cabinet makers do not feel the need to entrust them with important positions (Nyrup et al, 2023). Even when gender quotas result in women being appointed to high-salience ministerial positions, there is a risk that over time, following Escobar-Lemmon and Taylor-Robinson (2016), women are again relegated to tokenistic positions.…”
Section: Gender Quotas and Women's Descriptive Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As in other fields that have witnessed the emergence of comparative research agendas reaching across democratic, hybrid and autocratic regimes (see e.g. Helms 2020b; Nyrup et al 2022;Teorell and Lindberg 2019), scholars of ministerial turnover have increasingly sought to give additional meaning to their findings by putting them in a wider cross-regime perspective (e.g. Lee and Schuler 2020).…”
Section: Towards a Comparative Politics Of Cabinet Reshufflesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…años desde seminales trabajos hacia fines de los 80 y 90 (J. M. Martin, 1989;Moon & Fountain, 1997;Reynolds, 1999;Siaroff, 2000;D. T. Studlar & Moncrief, 1997), hasta otros más recientes (Armstrong et al, 2023;Barragán & Rodríguez, 2023;Gatto et al, 2022;Höhmann, 2022;Kroeber & Hüffelmann, 2022;Nyrup et al, 2023), buscando dar claridad a un proceso que acontecía en todo el mundo: el crecimiento de la participación de las mujeres en los ministerios (Annesley et al, 2019;Arriola & Johnson, 2014;Beckwith & Franceschet, 2022;Bego, 2014;Borrelli, 2010;Claveria, 2014;M. C. Escobar-Lemmon & Taylor-Robinson, 2016;Krook & O'Brien, 2012;Stockemer & Sundström, 2018).…”
unclassified