Film thickness measurements of a paint-on die spacer

Oliva, Richard A.; Lowe, J.A.; Ozaki, M.M.

doi:10.1016/0022-3913(88)90312-5

Cited by 12 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Grajower et al considered that this increased thickness with age of the material was due to partial evaporation of the solvent. Oliva 19 also found the thickness of diespacer varied with the position on the die and with application techniques; and noted that the most due to cementation (i.e., change in elevat i o n compared with pre-cemented elevation) from 130 m to -3 m ‡ ‡ for zero and four coats of die-spacer, respectively. Wang et al 21 found the application of four coats of Tru-fit die-spacer to dies prior to wax pattern construction resulted in cast full crowns with decreased seating discrepancies from 116 m to 12 m when a light seating force 5 lb (22 N) was applied and 73 m to 2 m when a heavier 30 lb (133 N) seating force was applied.…”

Section: Die-spacing and Crown Seatingmentioning

confidence: 97%

The effects of die‐Spacidng on post‐cementation crown elevation and retention

Carter¹,

Wilson

1997

Australian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reviews the relevant dental literature concerning the effect of die-spacing on crown elevation and pre-and post-cementation crown retention. Techniques of providing die-spacing and measurement of the thickness of die-spacer are discussed. A review of the role of the provision of a cement space in reducing post-cementation crown elevation is presented. Factors which may affect crown retention prior to and following cementation are also reviewed. The influence of variables in techniques and experimental design on the results of the studies reviewed is discussed.Key words: Die-spacing, crown elevation, pre-cementation retention, post-cementation retention.(Received for publication January 1996. Revised March 1996 Accepted April 1996.) IntroductionFull crowns frequently do not seat with minimal m a r ginal discrepancy following cementat i o n .

show abstract

Section: Die-spacing and Crown Seatingmentioning

confidence: 97%

The effects of die‐Spacidng on post‐cementation crown elevation and retention

Carter¹,

Wilson

1997

Australian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In another technique, Yuzbasioglu used a paint‐on die spacer as a substitute for PTFE tape. It has been noted that uniform application of die spacer is difficult to achieve, as it is dependent upon the clinician's technique of application . The same study also showed that die spacer thickness uniformity is not consistently achieved and is additionally influenced by brush and bristle charecteristics .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…It has been noted that uniform application of die spacer is difficult to achieve, as it is dependent upon the clinician's technique of application . The same study also showed that die spacer thickness uniformity is not consistently achieved and is additionally influenced by brush and bristle charecteristics . Therefore, the main disadvantage of this technique is the difficulty in achieving a uniform thickness of the die spacer and later ensuring its complete removal before cementation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Novel Universal Cementation Technique for Implant‐Supported Crowns with Subgingival Margins

Bhushan

Aras

Chitre

et al. 2016

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Restoration of implant crowns with subgingival margins has always been a challenge. If done precisely it leads to better treatment outcomes and prognosis. An incorrect technique and improper execution of the luting procedure are known to cause a high incidence of peri-implant disease due to incomplete elimination of the luting agent. Deep subgingival abutment margins are difficult to recognize, and cement removal in these cases becomes complicated if the sulcus depth is greater than 3 mm. Irrespective of the type of instrument used to remove the excess cement, scratches on the abutment and some cement remnants are consistently noticed. Therefore elimination of excess luting agent before the prosthesis is inserted intraorally is considered an effective technique to prevent complications due to excess luting agent. This article presents a chairside universal technique for cementation of implant crowns on abutments with deep subgingival margins. This technique attempts to minimize the amount of excess cement in peri-implant tissue.

show abstract

“…The thickness could be altered by applying some special means to relieve the heavy resistance of the cementing substance . Several studies have shown that the seating of crowns is greatly improved, and the effects of luting agent hydraulic pressure can be overcome by internal relief . Some methods of achieving internal relief include grinding the inside of the casting, internal carving of the wax pattern, etching with aqua regia, electrochemical milling, and venting.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%