2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/434/1/012280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filter bubble effect and religiosity: filter bubble effect implication in the formation of subjects and views of religiosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this point of view, in terms of religious information, we have to consider a strong bubble, a strong membrane. This is confirmed by the research of Zakaria and his colleagues who investigated the relationship between the filter bubble and religion in an Islamic religious environment in Indonesia (Zakaria et al 2018). They also agree that in the perspective of religious phenomenology, technology is not neutral but human formation, as well as allowing the gap it can affect humans.…”
Section: Religious Filter Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…From this point of view, in terms of religious information, we have to consider a strong bubble, a strong membrane. This is confirmed by the research of Zakaria and his colleagues who investigated the relationship between the filter bubble and religion in an Islamic religious environment in Indonesia (Zakaria et al 2018). They also agree that in the perspective of religious phenomenology, technology is not neutral but human formation, as well as allowing the gap it can affect humans.…”
Section: Religious Filter Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The latter point also highlights another feature of online communities: they allow agents to present themselves as community members in any way they want. As we will further 3 A brief list of reasons why the filter bubble has been deemed harmful for individuals and communities: because it can fuel political, religious, and other kinds of extremism (O'Callaghan et al 2013;Bozdag et al 2014;Zakaria et al 2018); various studies have proved that it is surely behind the diffusion of fake news (Arfini 2019; DiFranzo and Gloria 2017; Spratt and Agosto 2017); some have argued that is probably one of the factors that determine political affiliations and low disposition to change (Bozdag and van den Hoven 2015; Bozdag 2015; Spohr 2017). comment, the interface of online communities affords (Gibson 1977;Nagy and Neff 2015;Arfini et al 2017) particular actions of self-profiling and self-discovery that are rarely at disposal in the offline world.…”
Section: Understanding Identity Issues In Virtual Cognitive Nichesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon gives birth to an alienated perspective because he feels trapped in a bubble that can only see his point of view without looking at other people's opinions. This reality has the potential to give birth to a monoperspective virtual society; it only deifies its perspective and defines reality based on one point of view (Zakaria, Busro, & Furqon, 2018).…”
Section: Fatwa Packaging In the Post-truth Eramentioning
confidence: 99%