2020
DOI: 10.1080/19392397.2020.1845966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filter bubbles and guru effects: Jordan B. Peterson as a public intellectual in the attention economy

Abstract: Inge van de Ven & Ties van GemertTo cite this article: Inge van de Ven & Ties van Gemert (2020): Filter bubbles and guru effects: Jordan B. Peterson as a public intellectual in the attention economy, Celebrity Studies,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is little research on mainstream misogyny influencers, these appeals to authenticity can be similarly observed on the manosphere. Manosphere leaders appeal to this authenticity in their emphasis on telling the “facts” or “truth.” For example, Jordan Peterson became a “guru” of the manosphere through his intellectual credibility as an academic and use of “science” and evolutionary psychology to help justify misogynistic and gender essentialist philosophies (van de Ven & van Gemert, 2022). Presenting as authentic and authoritative, these manosphere influencers also play into social media’s “affective economy” (Ahmed, 2004) by providing “solutions” and support for men’s feelings of disenfranchisement and masculinity in crisis (Bujalka et al, 2022).…”
Section: Online Misogyny and “The Manosphere”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is little research on mainstream misogyny influencers, these appeals to authenticity can be similarly observed on the manosphere. Manosphere leaders appeal to this authenticity in their emphasis on telling the “facts” or “truth.” For example, Jordan Peterson became a “guru” of the manosphere through his intellectual credibility as an academic and use of “science” and evolutionary psychology to help justify misogynistic and gender essentialist philosophies (van de Ven & van Gemert, 2022). Presenting as authentic and authoritative, these manosphere influencers also play into social media’s “affective economy” (Ahmed, 2004) by providing “solutions” and support for men’s feelings of disenfranchisement and masculinity in crisis (Bujalka et al, 2022).…”
Section: Online Misogyny and “The Manosphere”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Influencer marketing) (Cunningham & Craig, 2017;García-Rapp & Roca-Cuberes, 2017;Mcquarrie et al, 2013). Some even link influencers to the trend of democratization of information whereby there is more room for competing voices from different social groups (van de Ven & van Gemert, 2022).…”
Section: Cancel Culture In the Youtube Beauty Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%