“…Judge, McNatt, and Xu (2010), in turn, conduct a literature mapping process that relies on the meta-analysis of 42 empirical studies, which classify scientific production on corruption in three broad areas: political or legal, economic and sociocultural. Mény (1996) makes his contribution by explaining how the phenomenon of corruption gained prominence over time and how, by becoming more complex, it gave rise to different modes of interpretation. Biason (2012a) outlines the main theories of corruption (personalistic, functionalistic, legalistic, economic, political, etc.…”