Financial flexibility, managerial efficiency and firm life cycle on firm performance

Abstract

Purpose As the capital market in China is still developing, several constraints on a Chinese-listed firm’s financing strategy have a direct impact on its financial flexibility. The purpose of this paper is to reconstruct traditional financial flexibility index (FFI) derived from the western context, provide empirical evidence within eastern context by modified FFI and examine how the managerial efficiency of Chinese-listed firms is demonstrated with modified FFI to escort corporate life cycle hypothesis. Design/methodology/approach By tailored FFI to fit the contemporary operations of Chinese-listed firms, this study investigates how managerial efficiency varies across different life stages to demonstrate the moderating power in the firm performance of financially flexible firm. Findings It is found that financially flexible firms in the Chinese stock market generally experience good firm performance, yet the managerial efficiency could gradually be diminishing at their mature stage even firms’ financial flexibility remains consistent with the agency theory. This paper sheds light on the necessity to reexamine the components in financial flexibility based on the eastern context, and provides avenue to further understand the managerial behavior of Chinese listed firms when considering firm life cycles. Research limitations/implications Although it is difficult for this current study to offer the precise weights on each factor in calculating financial flexibility, the judgment matrix method is adopted to at least provide reliable estimates in accordance with Chinese business contexts with less than 10 percent errors in contrast to the actual weights. Practical implications This modified FFI is particularly suitable for Chinese-listed firms under certain unique financial reporting regulations by adjusting a number of weights and factors. This study may help practitioners understand the managerial conduct of publicly listed firms in China. Originality/value The paper constructs a modified FFI with Chinese stock market characteristics embedded, and provides insightful evidence to explain the new pecking order theory by considering the life cycle stage of Chinese-listed companies.

Firm Life Cycle and Financial Performance: Evidence from Nigeria

“…However, the second group completely disagrees with the findings of this study and they include Chang et al (2017), Habib and Hassan (2017), Bayat and Noshahr (2018) and Shahzad et al (2019). Finally, the third group had mix results when compared and contrasted with the findings of this study and the scholars include Khamak et al (2018) and Chang and Ma (2019).…”

Strategic Management Accounting and Firm Performance: Evidence from Finance Businesses in Thailand

“…Managerial efficiency positively affects firms' strong performance (b = 0.21, p < 0.09). It is a result of firms' business operations and activities that reflect their ability to minimize input usage under the production of given output and to maximize output production with given input (Chang & Ma, 2019). Also, managerial efficiency that explicitly motivates firms' valuable customers in participating and buying products and services is a determinant of firm performance and profitability.…”

“…Managerial efficiency is a determinant of firm performance and profitability. It could be measured in two aspects, such as difference of its actual performance and what could have been achieved under best practice decisions (Sun, 2019), and its actual performance is relative to the maximum attainable performance that would be predicted by the production frontier (Chang & Ma, 2019).…”

“…Likewise, some studies have shown that strategic management accounting may not directly lead to firm performance, but it needs to have mediators that help link to firm performance. Accordingly, this study has proposed operational excellence, managerial efficiency and organizational effectiveness as the mediators of the study (Chang & Ma, 2019;Sharma & Singh, 2019).…”

Development of a multi-criteria decision-making model for comparing the performance of Turkish commercial banks

“…Shaverdi et al (2011) developed an approach based on TOPSIS, VIKOR and ELECTRE methods and balanced scorecard for evaluating performance for three non-governmental Iranian's banks. Chang and Ma (2019) presented the relationship between financial flexibility and firm performance and examined how managerial efficiency at different corporate life cycle stages can decide the focal relationship. Gupta and Vrat (2020) compared some major National Quality Award/Business Excellence Models in terms of the criteria employed and their relative weights by using the AHP.…”