Financing Social Innovation for Poverty Reduction: A Case Study of Microfinancing and Microenterprise Development in Bangladesh

Abstract

Microfinancing is widely perceived to contribute towards social innovation for poverty reduction. We examined the Challenging the Frontiers of Poverty Reduction (CFPR) programme implemented by the Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC) between 2002 and 2007, as it used an innovative approach to microfinancing by transferring assets rather than cash to ultra poor participants. We examined two aspects: (i) the impact of microfinancing through asset transfer instead of cash on social innovation leading to poverty reduction; (ii) the factors that contributed to positive or negative impact on the economic conditions and poverty levels of the participant households and the trajectories of changes experienced by the success and failure cases. For this, we employed survey data from twenty-one beneficiaries and eight in-depth interviews among these households. The study found that participants who demonstrated proper planning, hard work and personal interest in the enterprise through microfinancing have witnessed improved quality of life and poverty reduction, while lack of motivation, absence of proper planning and certain social barriers resulted in failure. Our study makes two major contributions: (i) it fills a gap in the literature on microfinancing of social innovation to help ultra poor households to graduate out of poverty; (ii) it provides policy alternatives for designing appropriate microfinancing programmes for ultra poor which can produce high success rates in reducing poverty through social innovation not only in Bangladesh, but also in other developing countries.

Research on the Library Enterprise Development Prospects and Challenges under the Environment of Big Data and Cloud Computing

“…Big data era is the higher stage of development of information society, information network technology has been in the society as a whole is widely used, people access to information resources more and more, in this case, the traditional library simple extensive service way already cannot adapt to the times, must be in the protection of library documents and resources rich and high quality at the same time, to continuous innovation in the service methods, provide targeted personalized for each reader, refinement and humanized services. It is a library for user-centered personalized push which will generally provide tailored personalized service for readers [3][4][5].…”

Sociālā inovācija: izaicinājumi un risinājumi Latvijā

“…1) idejas saskatīšana, 2) prototipu vai pilotprojekta izstrādāšana, 3) idejas īstenošana dzīvē, 4) prakses izplatīšana (European Commission, 2013: 9). Tomēr literatūras analīzes rezultātā tika secināts, ka sociālā inovācija sākas ne tikai no idejas, bet drīzāk no aktuālas sociālās problēmas, kura vēl nav atrisināta pilnā mērā vai ir atrisināta daļēji, vai arī ne ļoti efektīvi (Phills et al, 2008;OECD, 2010;Dover, 2011;Minks, 2011;Mahmuda et al, 2014;Howaldt et al, 2014). Tādēļ tiek atrasti labāki un efektīvāki sociālo problēmu risinājumi (Phills et al, 2008;Howaldt & Schwarz, 2010;Minks, 2011;Cajaiba-Santana, 2013;Klievink & Janssen, 2014).…”

Financial, organisational and informative involvement of the society in social innovation processes in Latvia

“…In the European Commission's "Guide to social innovation", it is argued that social innovation typically goes through stages starting as ideas, which may then be piloted or prototyped for being implemented as a new venture or as a new policy within an existing institution and scaled up in the final stage, making a real impact and becoming part of the norm (European Commission, 2013 2) prototyping or piloting; 3) implementation; 4) scaling (European Commission, 2013: 9) Based on the literature analysis, the project team have come to the conclusion that the starting point of social innovation is not just an idea but rather an urgent social problem which either hasn't been solved yet or is solved partly or not very effectively (Phills, Deiglmeier & Miller, 2008;OECD, 2010;Dover, 2011;Minks, 2011;Mahmuda, Baskaran & Pancholi, 2014;Howaldt et al, 2014, etc.). The research team defines social innovation as better, more efficient and effective solutions of social problems (Phills, Deiglmeier & Miller, 2008;Howaldt & Schwarz, 2010;Minks, 2011;Cajaiba-Santana, 2013;Klievink & Janssen, 2014).…”