Finding a place for discount usability engineering in agile development: throwing down the gauntlet

Kane, David W.

doi:10.1109/adc.2003.1231451

Cited by 47 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A further observation is that despite the call by Kane (2003) for more work on the development of heuristic and style guidelines for interaction design for use in agile contexts, these issues have not been fully taken into account. We only observed one paper which came close to examining this issue (Pexioto and da Silva, 2009).…”

Section: Figure 2 Factors Claims and Rebuttalsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Usability Work in Agile Systems Development Practice: A Systematic Review

Wale-Kolade

Nielsen

Päivärinta

2013

Building Sustainable Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Figure 2 Factors Claims and Rebuttalsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Usability Work in Agile Systems Development Practice: A Systematic Review

Wale-Kolade

Nielsen

Päivärinta

2013

Building Sustainable Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Scenario based descriptions [34] As Is Scenarios [10] With modifications Scenario based approaches [38] As Is User scenarios [33] With modifications Scenarios [25] With modifications Prototyping Prototyping Prototyping Prototypes [29] As Is Prototypes [28] As Is Prototypes [26] As Is Paper Prototypes Paper prototypes [31] As Is…”

Section: Scenarios and Storyboards Scenariosmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Ethnographical Observation Ethnography Ethnographic research [16] As Is Ethnographical Observation Observation [28] As Is Observation [29] As Is Card Sorting Card Sorting Card sorting [10] With modifications Card sorting [25] With modifications User Analysis Personas Personas Personas [16] As Is Personas [27] With modifications Personas [37] With modifications Personas [31] As Is Lightweight personas [38] With modifications Personas [33] With modifications Persona [39] As Is Persona [36] As Is Extreme personas [40] With modifications…”

Section: Contextual Interviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This occurs when, for example, the usability requirements are elicited in situ from customers that have a perfect understanding of the needs of the system but not of the different types of end users. This is an obstacle to the identification of potential usability problems facing novice end users [10] [11]. One of the principles of UCD, on the other hand, is to understand all user profiles [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Requirements Engineering Related Usability Techniques Adopted in Agile Development Processes

Magües

Castro

Acuña

2016

International Conferences on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Context: Over the last decade there has been a growing interest in the integration of agile software development process (ASDP) and user-centred design (UCD). However, there are no papers that study which usability techniques related to requirements engineering are being adopted in the ASDP, and there are no formalized proposals for their adoption. Objective: Identify which techniques related to requirements engineering activities are being adopted in the ASDP and determine how they are being adopted. Method: We have conducted a systematic mapping study (SMS) to retrieve the literature reporting the application of usability techniques in the ASDP. We analysed these techniques using a catalogue of techniques compiled by software engineering researchers. We then determined the manner in which the techniques that are being used in the ASDP were adopted. Results: The agile community is very much interested in adopting usability techniques. The most used techniques are Personas, contextual inquiry and prototyping. Conclusions: This research offers an overview of the adoption of usability techniques related to requirements engineering in ASDPs and reports how they are being adopted. We found that some of the techniques are being adapted for adoption.

show abstract

“…Thereupon, Kane [3] has pointed out that the Agile Alliance web-site does not have an article category for usability or interaction design. Nowadays, however, the web-site has a category addressed to usability, which contains twelve articles [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Usability in Agile Software Development: Extending the Interaction Design Process with Personas Approach

Haikara

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The current agile software development methods do not seem to address usability and interaction design issues enough, i.e., the interaction design process may remain implicit. However, few studies with positive results have been conducted concerning integrating explicit interaction design process into agile software development. In this study, the interaction design process of Mobile-D TM is extended with the personas approach. Empirical evaluation of the resulting model is performed in a case project. The results provide view points for both industrial and scientific purposes on the applications of interaction design activities in different stages of agile development process.

show abstract

Finding a place for discount usability engineering in agile development: throwing down the gauntlet

Cited by 47 publications

References 3 publications

Usability Work in Agile Systems Development Practice: A Systematic Review

Usability Work in Agile Systems Development Practice: A Systematic Review

Requirements Engineering Related Usability Techniques Adopted in Agile Development Processes

Usability in Agile Software Development: Extending the Interaction Design Process with Personas Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About