1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00383449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding all closed sets: A general approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guigues and Duquenne [18] described a minimal set of implications (exact rules) from which all rules can be derived, the Duquenne Guigues base or stem base. In 1984, Ganter developed the Next Closure algorithm ( [20], see also [21]) for its computation. Luxenburger was working on bases for partial implications (approximative rules) [30,31].…”
Section: History and State Of The Art In Fca-based Association Rule Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guigues and Duquenne [18] described a minimal set of implications (exact rules) from which all rules can be derived, the Duquenne Guigues base or stem base. In 1984, Ganter developed the Next Closure algorithm ( [20], see also [21]) for its computation. Luxenburger was working on bases for partial implications (approximative rules) [30,31].…”
Section: History and State Of The Art In Fca-based Association Rule Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even then the naïve algorithm enumerating each set S ∈ F and testing whether S is ρ-closed is inefficient because |F | can be exponential in |ρ(F )|. There are several results on efficient enumeration of ρ-closed sets for the case that the underlying set system is finite and closed under intersection (see, e.g., [2,3]). Among others, formal concept analysis [7] and closed frequent itemset mining (see, e.g., [6]) provide some representative applications of this case.…”
Section: The General Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the input. Moreover, some important operations, such as finding a concept, are performed for some representations (spanning trees [2,10], ordered lists [7], CbO trees [16], 2-3 trees, see [1] for the definition) in polynomial time, but for some other representations (unordered lists) they can be performed only in exponential time. A representation of a concept lattice can be considered reasonable if its size cannot be exponentially compressed w.r.t.…”
Section: On Principles Of Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%