2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10707-016-0276-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding dense locations in symbolic indoor tracking data: modeling, indexing, and processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare our method with two indoor flow computing methods [3], [4], [27] using RFID data. One method [3], [4] is specialized for semi-constrained indoor movement environments (e.g., convey belt systems) where each semantic location features one entry and one exit, both having an RFID reader. Such a strict setting enables to count objects in a location within a past time interval.…”
Section: Top-k Results Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We compare our method with two indoor flow computing methods [3], [4], [27] using RFID data. One method [3], [4] is specialized for semi-constrained indoor movement environments (e.g., convey belt systems) where each semantic location features one entry and one exit, both having an RFID reader. Such a strict setting enables to count objects in a location within a past time interval.…”
Section: Top-k Results Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We deploy ordinary RFID readers with 3-meter detection range [41] at doors. Following the experimental settings in [4], [27], reader detection ranges do not overlap in our setting. As a result, some doors are associated with no reader.…”
Section: Top-k Results Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations