Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1653771.1653813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding long and similar parts of trajectories

Abstract: A natural time-dependent similarity measure for two trajectories is their average distance at corresponding times. We give algorithms for computing the most similar subtrajectories under this measure, assuming the two trajectories are given as two polygonal, possibly self-intersecting lines with time stamps. For the case when a minimum duration of the subtrajectories is specified and the subtrajectories must start at corresponding times, we give a linear-time algorithm. The algorithm is based on a result of in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it would be interesting to look at other types of clustering methods with these alignments, for instance density based ones. Finally, we would like to look at similarity measures from computational geometry, as for instance in [3,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it would be interesting to look at other types of clustering methods with these alignments, for instance density based ones. Finally, we would like to look at similarity measures from computational geometry, as for instance in [3,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The w = 1 setting means that the average difference between two points in the space dimension is roughly equal to the average difference in the time dimension. 3 To investigate the influence of trajectory compression on the clustering performance we used 4 compression settings. The first setting being = 0, thus, we apply no compression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our new lower bound filtering approach has ( 1 Se + 1 − α) • |T | calls. Our lower bound filtering approach is better than our previous columnwise lookup table approach if 1 Se + 1 − α < 1 (i.e., α > 1…”
Section: Comparison Of Cost Models Of the Three Ap-mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Se ), and is worse otherwise. In practice, in order to make α > 1 Se , we need to select a preferable S e , k, and track envelope formation strategy. According to our discussion on factors controlling α in Section 4.2.3, in order to have high pruning ratio α, we should prefer a smaller k and S e , and track envelope formation based on "Jaccard coefficient", or "overlap" rather than "random".…”
Section: Comparison Of Cost Models Of the Three Ap-mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation