2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding our roots and celebrating our shoots: Plant virology in Virology, 1955–1964

Abstract: To celebrate the sixtieth anniversary of Virology a survey is made of the plant viruses, virologists and their institutions, and tools and technology described in the first decade of plant virus publications in Virology. This was a period when plant viruses increasingly became tools of discovery as epistemic objects and plant virology became a discipline discrete from plant pathology and other life sciences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Allard, a USDA scientist, published convincing studies that TMV was an infectious entity, not a physiological or abiotic anomaly (2). Yet for more than a decade, the nature of mosaic diseases remained ill-defined: A virus was smaller than a bacterium, was not visible using light microscopy, and could not be grown on an artificial medium (15,83,84,87,88,92,97,98). Indirect methods advanced by Helen Purdy Beale (Boyce Thompson Institute), Francis O. Holmes (Rockefeller Institute, Princeton, NJ, for the work discussed here), H. H. McKinney (USDA), and James Johnson (University of Wisconsin), using tools of serology, host range, virus strains, and cross-protection slowly chipped away at the confusion, toward a determination of the biological properties of TMV and other plant viruses (14,84,87,(91)(92)(93)97).…”
Section: Early Twentieth-century Virologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allard, a USDA scientist, published convincing studies that TMV was an infectious entity, not a physiological or abiotic anomaly (2). Yet for more than a decade, the nature of mosaic diseases remained ill-defined: A virus was smaller than a bacterium, was not visible using light microscopy, and could not be grown on an artificial medium (15,83,84,87,88,92,97,98). Indirect methods advanced by Helen Purdy Beale (Boyce Thompson Institute), Francis O. Holmes (Rockefeller Institute, Princeton, NJ, for the work discussed here), H. H. McKinney (USDA), and James Johnson (University of Wisconsin), using tools of serology, host range, virus strains, and cross-protection slowly chipped away at the confusion, toward a determination of the biological properties of TMV and other plant viruses (14,84,87,(91)(92)(93)97).…”
Section: Early Twentieth-century Virologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), constitutes one of the most important sanitary problems for seed potato growers and has recently been classified as one of the ten most important plant viruses from economic and scientific points of view (Scholthof et al. ; reviewed in Scholthof ). Similarly, in Tunisia, PVY is one of the major problems in seed potato multiplication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%