The present study sought to determine whether semantic satiation is merely a by-product of adaptation or satiation of upstream, nonsemantic perceptual processes or whether the effect can have a locus in semantic memory. This was done by measuring event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in a semantic word-detection task involving multiple presentations of primes and critical related and unrelated words in three experiments involving visual (Experiment 1) and auditory (Experiments 2A and 2B) stimuli. Primes varied in their type case (Experiment 1) or pitch (Experiment 2B) in order to discourage sensory adaptation. Prime satiation and relatedness of the primes to the critical word had interacting effects on ERP amplitude to critical words, particularly within the time-window of the N400 component. Because numerous studies have indicated a role for the N400in semantic processing, modulation ofthe N400relatedness effect by prime satiation (with little or no contribution from perceptual adaptation) suggests that semantic memory can be directly satiated, rather than the cost to semantic processing necessarily resulting from impoverishment of perceptual inputs.When a word is repeatedly produced or perceived, many people experience what has become known as the semantic satiation effect, a subjective and temporary loss of the meaning of that word. Early research by adherents of the introspectionist school analyzed the phenomenal qualities of semantic satiation (e.g., Severance & Washburn, 1907). More recent research has shown that such repetitive priming inhibits performance in semantic verification tasks (Smith, 1984; Smith & Klein, 1990).
RECENT STUDIESThree significant recent studies have sought to answer important questions concerning the locus and nature of the semantic satiation effect. Balota and Black (1997) examined semantic satiation in younger and older adults in a series of semantic verification experiments. Their basic paradigm required participants to make speeded judgments about whether two visually presented words were Preparation of this report was supported by NIMH Grant MH57501 to 1.K. and NICHD Grant HD25889 to P.J.H. Correspondence concerning this article may be sent to 1. Kounios at the Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Walnut Street, Suite 400A, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6228 (e-mail: jkounios@ psych,upenn.edu), or to P.1.Holcomb, Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155 (e-mail: pholcomb@tufts. edu).semantically related (e.g., royalty-queen) or not (e.g., royalty-box) after 2, 12, or 22 visual presentations ofone of the members of the pair. They found evidence of semantic satiation, defined as a diminution ofthe difference in mean reaction time and accuracy between responses to related and unrelated pairs. Specifically, they reported that (I) the relatedness effect decreased with more repetition in younger participants (particularly for related pairs of relatively low strength of association-e.g., royaltyduke), whereas older participants d...