2008
DOI: 10.1186/1742-6413-5-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine needle aspiration biopsy of intraoral and oropharyngeal mass lesions

Abstract: BackgroundFine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy has been rarely used in oral and oropharyngeal lesions. The goal of this study was to assess the value and accuracy of FNA biopsy in the diagnosis of oral and oropharyngeal lesions particularly in regards to discriminating benign from malignant tumors.MethodsSixteen cases of FNA biopsies obtained of various intraoral and oropharyngeal masses or lesions performed at our institution during the eight-year period from 1998 to 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. The asp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
56
1
18

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
56
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common masses biopsied in this manner are odontogenic tumors, intraosseous lesions, minor salivary gland tumors, sublingual salivary glands and other oral regions. 6,[8][9][10][11][12] However, some reports have described the relevance of FNAB for the diagnosis of oral cavity lesions and oropharyngeal lesions. 8,9 The most commonly described advantages of the FNAB method are the preoperative diagnoses of lesions, clinical follow-up, the ability to avoid unnecessary damage to crucial structures of the oral cavity, more comfort for the patient and a low risk of infection and tissue damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most common masses biopsied in this manner are odontogenic tumors, intraosseous lesions, minor salivary gland tumors, sublingual salivary glands and other oral regions. 6,[8][9][10][11][12] However, some reports have described the relevance of FNAB for the diagnosis of oral cavity lesions and oropharyngeal lesions. 8,9 The most commonly described advantages of the FNAB method are the preoperative diagnoses of lesions, clinical follow-up, the ability to avoid unnecessary damage to crucial structures of the oral cavity, more comfort for the patient and a low risk of infection and tissue damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,[8][9][10][11][12] However, some reports have described the relevance of FNAB for the diagnosis of oral cavity lesions and oropharyngeal lesions. 8,9 The most commonly described advantages of the FNAB method are the preoperative diagnoses of lesions, clinical follow-up, the ability to avoid unnecessary damage to crucial structures of the oral cavity, more comfort for the patient and a low risk of infection and tissue damage. 8,9 The most commonly reported disadvantages are the fact that there is little space to perform the backward and forward movement necessary to complete the procedure, and the difficulty involved in fixing the lesion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These lesions have been traditionally treated on clinical basis and evaluated by surgical biopsy. Studies of transmucosal needle aspiration of oral cavity lesions are limited [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The oral cavity and oropharynx are readily accessible to fine needle aspiration (FNA) and it may be a useful technique for preliminary assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10] Pfeiffer et al Has described the use of transmucosal core needle biopsy of the tongue base.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%