Fine-Needle Percutaneous Biopsy of Renal Masses with Helical CT Guidance

Lechevallier, É.; André, Marc; Barriol, D.; Daniel, Laurent; Eghazarian, C.; Fromont, M. De; Rossi, D.; Coulange, C.

doi:10.1148/radiology.216.2.r00au01506

Cited by 202 publications

(144 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

130

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This percentage is similar to that found in other series, in which larger needles, and more passes, and even core biopsies for histology were used. 3,6,26,27 This rate of aspirates inadequate for diagnosis is far lower than the 60% of inadequate aspirates obtained by Campbell et al 15 in a series of 25 small (<5 cm), solid, clinically localized renal masses aspirated with 22G Chiba needles under CT guidance. In our series there were only four cases (44%) inadequate for diagnosis out of the nine renal tumors measuring <5.5 cm at their largest diameter.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Solid renal masses in adults: Image‐guided fine‐needle aspiration cytology and imaging techniques—“Two Heads Better Than One?”

García‐Solano

Acosta-Ortega

Pérez-Guillermo

et al. 2007

Diagnostic Cytopathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We have compared the diagnostic accuracy of image-guided 25G-FNA (fine-needle aspiration) and imaging modalities in a group of 31 patients with solid space-occupying renal lesions. All patients had undergone total nephrectomy and histologic sections were available for review.By FNA there were 24 malignant diagnoses, I benign diagnosis, and 6 cases with yield inadequate for diagnosis. The FNA accuracy for malignancy was 100% with no false positive cases; cancer typing by FNA matched the final histologic diagnoses in 91.6% of cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 80%, 14%, 80%, and 14%, respectively.Radiologically there were 26 diagnoses of malignancy, I of benignity, and 4 indeterminate lesions (IL). Accuracy for malignancy was 100%, with one false positive case; cancer typing matched the final histologic diagnoses in 84%. Sensitivity of imaging modalities was 86%, specificity 17%, positive predictive value 83%, and negative predictive value 20%. Four IL corresponded to renal cell carcinoma in the final histologic report: two IL had a previous diagnosis of malignancy by FNA, and the yield of two was inadequate for cytologic diagnosis.Both techniques have 100% accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of imaging techniques are slightly higher than those obtained by FNA. Imaging techniques and FNA of solid renal masses complement each other in IL and in nondiagnostic FNAs. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2008;36:8-12.' 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Key Words: solid renal masses; fine-needle aspiration; needle biopsy; cytology; imaging techniques Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has a well-defined and traditional role in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous conditions in almost every organ of the body. Its utility is undeniable in space-occupying lesions of various locations; however, the use of FNA in space-occupying lesions of the kidney has recently tended to be confined to specific clinico-pathological conditions, mainly because of the refinement of imaging techniques. [1][2][3][4][5][6] The purpose of this article is 3-fold: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of image-guided 25G-FNA and imaging modalities in a group of 31 patients with solid space-occupying renal lesions who later underwent total nephrectomy (TN) for histologic confirmation; to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the two techniques; and to investigate whether FNA provides valuable information for the clinical management of patients with solid renal masses. Material and MethodsBetween January 2000 and July 2006 a total number of 129 patients of our hospital had been referred to either image-guided 25G-FNA as preoperative diagnostic procedure of renal space-occupying lesions, or to some type of imaging modality for planning clinical management, or had been referred to both. Of these 129 patients, the 31 in whom image-guided FNA, imaging studies, and TN were available were chosen for the present study.The cytologic specimens of im...

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Solid renal masses in adults: Image‐guided fine‐needle aspiration cytology and imaging techniques—“Two Heads Better Than One?”

García‐Solano

Acosta-Ortega

Pérez-Guillermo

et al. 2007

Diagnostic Cytopathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similar results have been reported in other series. 15,16,29,30,32,33 Therefore, most tumors with high nuclear grade on biopsy are usually truly high grade, but tumors with low nuclear grade on biopsy may turn out to be high grade on resection specimens.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…12,13 The improvement in biopsy equipment and technique, including the use of coaxial biopsy needles, may be one of the reasons for the rarity of this complication in more recent years. 14 In earlier studies, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] the diagnostic accuracy of RCB was somewhat unsatisfactory; however, it has dramatically improved in recent years. In series published between 2007 and 2013 (Table 1), the diagnostic accuracy of tumor subtyping ranges from 77.5% to 100% (median, 91%).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Percutaneous Renal Needle Core Biopsy and Its Potential Impact on the Clinical Management of Renal Cortical Neoplasms

Gellert

Mehra

Chen

et al. 2014

Archives of Pathology &Amp; Laboratory Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context While biopsies are now increasingly being performed for the diagnosis of renal cortical neoplasms, the influence of the rendered pathological diagnoses on the clinical management is only rarely documented. Objectives To report our experience with consecutively performed renal biopsies and the potential impact of the diagnosis on subsequent clinical management. Design Material from needle biopsies performed consecutively at our institution between 2006 and 2011 was reviewed. The influence of the reported pathology results on the clinical management was determined from patient follow-up medical record review. Results In total, 218 percutaneous biopsies for renal masses were performed during this period. Among them, 181 (83%) yielded neoplastic tissue, including 81 clear cell renal cell carcinomas, 29 low-grade oncocytic neoplasms, 7 papillary renal cell carcinomas, 5 clear cell papillary renal cell carcinomas, 5 angiomyolipomas, and 14 urothelial carcinomas. Fourteen additional cases (6%) contained lesional material from clinically known nonneoplastic processes, for a total diagnostic yield of 89%. Twenty-three (11%) were nonrepresentative of lesional tissue. In 10 of these, repeat biopsies or resections established the diagnosis of renal tumors. Biopsy diagnosis was confirmed in 29 of 30 cases (97%) on subsequent nephrectomy. Following the biopsy diagnosis, there were significant differences in the clinical management; overall, 79% of clear cell renal cell carcinomas received therapeutic interventions, and 17% were put on active surveillance. In contrast, 77% of the benign or low-grade lesions were put on active surveillance. Conclusions Accurate and specific diagnosis can be rendered on renal core biopsy in most renal tumors, and the biopsy diagnosis can have a definitive role in their clinical management.

show abstract

“…Percutaneous renal mass biopsy must not be performed routinely for renal lesions less than 40 mm but it should be indicated for incompletely accurate renal imaging diagnosis after a full imaging evaluation. Almost in 30% of the selected patients, a surgical procedure became no mandatory after renal biopsy results were obtained (9,11) . The risk of complications associated with EUS FNA ranges from less than 1-6%.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

INITIAL EXPERIENCE WITH ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION OF RENAL MASSES: indications, applications and limitations

Moura

Lopes

Srougi

et al. 2014

Arq. Gastroenterol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-Context -Tissue sampling of renal masses is traditionally performed via the percutaneous approach or laparoscopicaly.The utility of endoscopic ultrasound to biopsy renal lesions it remains unclear and few cases have been reported. Objectives -To evaluate the feasibility and outcome of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration of renal tumors. Method -Consecutive subjects undergoing attempted endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration of a kidney mass after evaluation with computerized tomography or magnetic resonance. Results -Ten procedures were performed in nine male patients (median age 54.7 years) on the right (n = 4) and left kidney (n = 4) and bilaterally (n = 1). Kidney masses (median diameter 55 mm ; range 13-160 mm) were located in the upper pole (n = 3), the lower pole (n = 2) and the mesorenal region (n = 3). In two cases, the mass involved more than one kidney region. Surgical resection confirmed renal cell carcinoma in six patients in whom pre-operative endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration demonstrated renal cell carcinoma. No complications were reported. Conclusions -Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration appears as a safe and feasible procedure with good results and minimal morbidity. HEADINGS -Kidney neoplasms, diagnosis. Ultrasonography. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.

show abstract

Fine-Needle Percutaneous Biopsy of Renal Masses with Helical CT Guidance

Cited by 202 publications

References 17 publications

Solid renal masses in adults: Image‐guided fine‐needle aspiration cytology and imaging techniques—“Two Heads Better Than One?”

Solid renal masses in adults: Image‐guided fine‐needle aspiration cytology and imaging techniques—“Two Heads Better Than One?”

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Percutaneous Renal Needle Core Biopsy and Its Potential Impact on the Clinical Management of Renal Cortical Neoplasms

INITIAL EXPERIENCE WITH ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION OF RENAL MASSES: indications, applications and limitations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About