2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-015-9425-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finger contact sensing and the application in dexterous hand manipulation

Abstract: If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tactile sensors should be either: a) flexible and appropriately shaped to envelop a given surface, as in iCub tactile fingertip sensors ( Figure 11(a, b) [103]; b) rigid and shaped as an attachment part, e.g. [34] or [104] where a 3D-shaped tactile sensing array and an ellipsoid F/T sensor (Figure 11(c) and (e) ) replace the fingertips of the Shadow robot hand [98]. In another version of the Shadow robot Hand with the integrated BioTac multimodal tactile sensor, each finger loses one DoF (Figure 11(d)), -the sensor is as big as the two last links, distal and middle phalanges of the human index finger.…”
Section: Issues Related To the Shape Of The Attachment Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tactile sensors should be either: a) flexible and appropriately shaped to envelop a given surface, as in iCub tactile fingertip sensors ( Figure 11(a, b) [103]; b) rigid and shaped as an attachment part, e.g. [34] or [104] where a 3D-shaped tactile sensing array and an ellipsoid F/T sensor (Figure 11(c) and (e) ) replace the fingertips of the Shadow robot hand [98]. In another version of the Shadow robot Hand with the integrated BioTac multimodal tactile sensor, each finger loses one DoF (Figure 11(d)), -the sensor is as big as the two last links, distal and middle phalanges of the human index finger.…”
Section: Issues Related To the Shape Of The Attachment Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation errors of normal force and friction force were less than 0.04N for the rigid finger. It has also been shown in [27], the contact sensing algorithm can also be extended to fingertip covered with soft layers, allowing the proposed controller work for compliant fingertips as well.…”
Section: A Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 that shows an overall accuracy of 83.3% was obtained. It can be noticed that most objects can be recognized successfully; however, some are still assigned to wrong labels, especially those with similar local shapes, e.g., different pliers (6,7,8) or scissors (11,12). These objects are expected to be further classified by utilizing distribution of their local features in future work.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the view of hardware, multiple tactile sensors have been developed using various sensing principles [1]- [5], e.g., capacitive, piezoelectric, optical, resistive and ultrasonic etc. In the meantime, some researchers contributed to decoding the conveyed message by the tactile sensors to retrieve the information of interacted object, such as contact locations [6], [7], slippage [8], object pose [9] and surface textures [10]- [12]. As defined in [13], the object characteristics can mainly be divided into two categories, i.e., material and geometric properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%