2019
DOI: 10.2478/s11756-019-00363-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fingerprinting the genetic variation and intergeneric hybrid dynamics in the family Asteraceae (genera Helianthus, Echinaceae, Tagetes and Verbesina) using iPBS markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to other retrotransposon-based molecular markers that require specific primers for the flanking regions of the particular retrotransposon, iPBS uses universal primers which enable the amplification of various types of LTRs. So far, there are several studies in which dominant iPBS markers were successfully applied for the estimation of genetic diversity and differentiation of plants (Bonchev and Vassilevska-Ivanova 2020 ; Khapilina et al 2021 ; Naeem et al 2021 ) and fungi (Ates et al 2019 ; Turzhanova et al 2020 ; Erper et al 2021 ). According to our knowledge, iPBS markers have only been used once for the genetic study of genus Avena , reporting genetic diversity and differentiation of Latvian A. fatua populations (Nečajeva et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to other retrotransposon-based molecular markers that require specific primers for the flanking regions of the particular retrotransposon, iPBS uses universal primers which enable the amplification of various types of LTRs. So far, there are several studies in which dominant iPBS markers were successfully applied for the estimation of genetic diversity and differentiation of plants (Bonchev and Vassilevska-Ivanova 2020 ; Khapilina et al 2021 ; Naeem et al 2021 ) and fungi (Ates et al 2019 ; Turzhanova et al 2020 ; Erper et al 2021 ). According to our knowledge, iPBS markers have only been used once for the genetic study of genus Avena , reporting genetic diversity and differentiation of Latvian A. fatua populations (Nečajeva et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the iPBS retrotransposon technique has been selected as a marker to examine population genetic diversity and structure in many plant genera such as Cicer (Andeden et al 2013), Vitis (Guo et al 2014), Pisum (Baloch et al 2015), Phaseolus (Nemli et al 2015), Psidium (Mehmood et al 2017), Castanea, Fagus and Quercus (Coutinho et al 2018), Chenopodium (Hossein-Pour et al 2019), Laurus (Karık et al 2019), Hordeum (Bonchev et al 2019), Origanum (Karagoz et al 2020). Moreover, in Asteraceae iPBS method has been proved to be a reliable marker for the evaluation of genetic diversity at infraspecific level, as well as the intergeneric hybrid in several genera (Gailite and Rungis 2012;Ali et al 2019;Bonchev and Vassilevska-Ivanova 2020). To simplify the application of molecular tools and offer a better understanding of the genetic diversity of Cissampelopsis, we utilized iPBS molecular markers in these species for the first time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%