2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finishing pigs that are divergent in feed efficiency show small differences in intestinal functionality and structure

Abstract: Controversial information is available regarding the feed efficiency-related variation in intestinal size, structure and functionality in pigs. The present objective was therefore to investigate the differences in visceral organ size, intestinal morphology, mucosal enzyme activity, intestinal integrity and related gene expression in low and high RFI pigs which were reared at three different geographical locations (Austria, AT; Northern Ireland, NI; Republic of Ireland, ROI) using similar protocols. Pigs (n = 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regards to the functional anatomy of the gut, this is related to the fact that major genes driving absorption processes for anions, sodium, carbohydrates, amino acids, minerals, and lipids are predominately expressed in the proximal part of the intestinal tract [40]. Accordingly, previous analysis of different parts of the gastrointestinal tract and their morphology revealed no significant differences in the ileum and caecum between high and low RFI pigs, whereas some distinct differences were observed in the duodenum and jejunum, such as Goblet cell number per villus height and nutrient transporter gene expression [33,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…With regards to the functional anatomy of the gut, this is related to the fact that major genes driving absorption processes for anions, sodium, carbohydrates, amino acids, minerals, and lipids are predominately expressed in the proximal part of the intestinal tract [40]. Accordingly, previous analysis of different parts of the gastrointestinal tract and their morphology revealed no significant differences in the ileum and caecum between high and low RFI pigs, whereas some distinct differences were observed in the duodenum and jejunum, such as Goblet cell number per villus height and nutrient transporter gene expression [33,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The activity of lactase, maltase, and sucrase was determined in mucosal scrapings from the duodenum. Preparation of duodenal homogenates (20%, w/v) and mucosal enzyme activity measurements were performed as recently described ( Metzler-Zebeli et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feed conversion is the amount of feed which needed to be consumed to gain 1 kg of BW. The lower the value, the higher the efficiency of the feed to increase the livestocks' BW [23]. The lowest to the highest conversion rates were T4 (100% commercial feed), followed by T3, T2 and T1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%