2003
DOI: 10.1023/b:kthe.0000019787.69435.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-Dimensional Motives and the Conjectures of Beilinson and Murre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of the present paper is to investigate some interesting links between motivic finite-dimensionality and representability of algebraic cycles on three-dimensional varieties over an arbitrary algebraically closed ground field k. In particular, we will show that the motive of a smooth projective threefold X over k can be decomposed into a sum of Lefschetz and Abelian motives if and only if zero-cycles are representable on X (Theorem 8). To some extent, this result can be considered as a most possible analog of Theorem 7 from [12]. Notice that representability of zero-cycles on Fano threefolds was proved uniformly by Kollár in [16], which was a generalization of the results of Bloch and Murre, see a survey in [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose of the present paper is to investigate some interesting links between motivic finite-dimensionality and representability of algebraic cycles on three-dimensional varieties over an arbitrary algebraically closed ground field k. In particular, we will show that the motive of a smooth projective threefold X over k can be decomposed into a sum of Lefschetz and Abelian motives if and only if zero-cycles are representable on X (Theorem 8). To some extent, this result can be considered as a most possible analog of Theorem 7 from [12]. Notice that representability of zero-cycles on Fano threefolds was proved uniformly by Kollár in [16], which was a generalization of the results of Bloch and Murre, see a survey in [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Finite-dimensional motives, which had been introduced by S.Kimura in [15], shed a new light on the motivic picture of intersection theory. If X is a surface over an algebraically closed field with algebraic second cohomology group, the Chow group of zero cycles on X is representable if and only if the motive M(X) is finite-dimensional, see [12], Theorem 7. The purpose of the present paper is to investigate some interesting links between motivic finite-dimensionality and representability of algebraic cycles on three-dimensional varieties over an arbitrary algebraically closed ground field k. In particular, we will show that the motive of a smooth projective threefold X over k can be decomposed into a sum of Lefschetz and Abelian motives if and only if zero-cycles are representable on X (Theorem 8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the above notions apply. In the commutative world these finiteness notions were extensively studied by André-Kahn, Guletskii, Guletskii-Pedrini, Kimura, Mazza, and others; see [1,2,13,14,19,31]. For instance, Guletskii and Pedrini proved that given a smooth projective surface S (over a field of characteristic zero) with p g (S) = 0, the Chow motive M (S) is Kimura-finite if and only if Bloch's conjecture on the Albanese kernel for S holds.…”
Section: Proposition 726 the Functor (−)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Недавно было обнаружено, что для поверхности X с p g = 0 гипотеза Блоха верна тогда и только тогда, когда мотив M (X) конечномерен в смысле Кимуры (см. [4], [5]). …”
unclassified