2018
DOI: 10.1504/ijecb.2018.10013562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis for knee implants with suitable material combinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in some studies, the use of FEM led to the conclusion that polyethylene tibial implant applies more pressure on the cancellous bone than the metal equivalent and also that, with the metal tray, more cancellous bone is lost in the proximal tibia because of resorption (16). Although polyethylene has lower strength compared to metal, the strength it has is enough for the survival of the implant (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in some studies, the use of FEM led to the conclusion that polyethylene tibial implant applies more pressure on the cancellous bone than the metal equivalent and also that, with the metal tray, more cancellous bone is lost in the proximal tibia because of resorption (16). Although polyethylene has lower strength compared to metal, the strength it has is enough for the survival of the implant (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional materials used for the design of knee implant are titanium, ceramics, polyethylene, cobalt-chromium etc. These materials have certain merits like biocompatibility, flexibility, strength, but also have problems regarding various reactions taking place within the body like necrosis in periprosthetic tissue, poor frictional resistance [2]. This research was basically conducted to provide an alternative material for the fabrication of knee implant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%