2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis of contact deformation regimes of an elastic-power plastic hardening sinusoidal asperity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another recent paper on the topic is by Liu and Proudhon [129], which also includes the effect of strain hardening. Some of the results shown in this work appear to indicate that the average pressure does surpass the yield strength by up to a factor of 6, well past the conventional value of three.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Sinusoidal Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another recent paper on the topic is by Liu and Proudhon [129], which also includes the effect of strain hardening. Some of the results shown in this work appear to indicate that the average pressure does surpass the yield strength by up to a factor of 6, well past the conventional value of three.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Sinusoidal Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of a highly spherical powder morphology allowed a consistent simplification in modelling. Nevertheless, Hertz's contact theory, giving an analytical solution to the sphere/plane contact, could not be applied due to consistent local plastic deformations that, according to [15], would appear in early deformation stages, well below the sensitivity of the experimental system. Instead, a FEM 2D axisymmetric model was developed on Abaqus/Standard® commercial software.…”
Section: Single Particle Micro-compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is to finiteelement models that they are increasingly turning to validate analytical stochastic models, for example, [17][18][19][20]. Finite element modeling of rough surfaces contact is considered to be superior for elastic-plastic material behavior [21] and, moreover, is expected to deliver reference results for other contact mechanics approaches [17]. The essential advantage over other methods is also that it allows to consider influence of the form of asperities and change of material properties in the deformation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a lot of work is devoted to single asperity models. More often, three approaches were used: the flattening of the deformed sphere between two absolutely hard surfaces [30][31][32], the flattening of the sinusoidal asperity by a rigid flat [21,28,29], and the indentation of a rigid hemisphere into the deformable space. Ghaednia et al [33], using the finite element method, solved a thermo-electro mechanical axisymmetric problem for elastic perfectly-plastic deformation of a hemisphere and a substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%