1982
DOI: 10.21236/ada131271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Analysis of Shock-Induced Hull Cavitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, numerical solvers are of great interests. Felippa and DeRuntz (1984) developed a cavitating acoustic finite element (CAFE) method. Later, Geers (2003, 2004) improved CAFE method and developed a cavitating acoustic spectral element (CASE) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, numerical solvers are of great interests. Felippa and DeRuntz (1984) developed a cavitating acoustic finite element (CAFE) method. Later, Geers (2003, 2004) improved CAFE method and developed a cavitating acoustic spectral element (CASE) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the viewpoint of formulation, modeling, discretization and numerical solution, a wide range of computational procedures have been developed over the past three decades. They range from tightly-to-loosely coupled to locally partitioned [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. For example, FSI problems of blood flow typically adopt tightly coupled formulation and solution procedures [41], whereas aeroelasticity problems employ partitioned solution procedures [71].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, L-L approaches are able to accurately capture the transient stress field in general solid structures [6][7][8]17,26,27]. The L-L approach has also been used in CAFE [10] and ABAQUS [1]. Both CAFE and ABAQUS discretize the fluid medium using Lagrangian finite element formulation based on linear acoustic assumptions (small fluid motion, finite fluid pressure, and constant fluid density and sound speed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As summarized in the Sect. 2, there are different coupling schemes (see for example[10,37,42,46]), with pros and cons, to resolve the transient interactions. In the current work, an interface capturing technique, featuring the method of fluid characteristics and the method of ghost fluids, is used to couple the Eulerian fluid solver and the Lagrangian solid solver.A schematic drawing of the interface capturing technique is shown inFig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%