2009
DOI: 10.1029/2008jb006174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element simulations of dynamic shear rupture experiments and dynamic path selection along kinked and branched faults

Abstract: [1] We analyze the nucleation and propagation of shear cracks along nonplanar, kinked, and branched fault paths corresponding to the configurations used in recent laboratory fracture studies by Rosakis (2003, 2009). The aim is to reproduce numerically those shear rupture experiments and from that provide an insight into processes which are active when a crack, initially propagating in mode II along a straight path, interacts with a bend in the fault or a branching junction. The experiments involved impact loa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rousseau and Rosakis (2009) investigated the effect of more complex fault geometries including kinking and branching on rupture propagation in a homalite material. At the same time, Templeton et al (2009) were able to simulate experimental results numerically. The control on rupture velocity in general and super-shear ruptures specifically is a very active field in analogue earthquake studies (e.g Lu et al, 2009;Schubnel et al, 2011;Mello et al, 2010Mello et al, , 2014Mello et al, , 2016Passelègue et al, 2013Passelègue et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Rupture Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Rousseau and Rosakis (2009) investigated the effect of more complex fault geometries including kinking and branching on rupture propagation in a homalite material. At the same time, Templeton et al (2009) were able to simulate experimental results numerically. The control on rupture velocity in general and super-shear ruptures specifically is a very active field in analogue earthquake studies (e.g Lu et al, 2009;Schubnel et al, 2011;Mello et al, 2010Mello et al, , 2014Mello et al, , 2016Passelègue et al, 2013Passelègue et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Rupture Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Experimental stress analysis near a crack or a void has been the subject of an intense research effort (see for instance Lim and Ravi-Chandar [19,20], Schubnel et al [25], Templeton et al [27]), but the stress field near a rigid inclusion embedded in an elastic matrix, a fundamental problem in the design of composites, has surprisingly been left almost unexplored (Theocaris [28]; Theocaris and Paipetis [29,30], Reedy and Guess [22]) and has never been investigated via photoelasticity. 1 Though the analytical determination of elastic fields around inclusions is a problem in principle solvable with existing methodologies (Movchan and Movchan [14], Muskhelishvili [15], Savin [24]) detailed treatments are not available and http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.004 0013-7944/Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This formulation does not take important dynamic weakening effects into account, but has successfully been used to model earthquake rupture in single fault models (e.g., Duan and Oglesby, 2005), fault step models (e.g. Harris and Day, 1999) and branched geometries (e.g., Aochi et al, 2000;Kame et al, 2003;Templeton et al, 2009).…”
Section: Linear Slip-weakeningmentioning
confidence: 99%