1995
DOI: 10.1016/0898-1221(95)00144-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element solution of the Helmholtz equation with high wave number Part I: The h-version of the FEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
451
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 538 publications
(463 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
451
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…With suitable boundary conditions the Helmholtz equation (5) can be solved using a variety of numerical methods [10][11][12][13][14] . The accuracy of the numerical solution from the Helmholtz equation depends significantly on the wavenumber, κ (κ=ω/c).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With suitable boundary conditions the Helmholtz equation (5) can be solved using a variety of numerical methods [10][11][12][13][14] . The accuracy of the numerical solution from the Helmholtz equation depends significantly on the wavenumber, κ (κ=ω/c).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the discretisation stepsize h of a numerical method has to be sufficiently refined to resolve the oscillations. A natural rule for such adjustment is to force [11,15,16] constant ·h = κ (6) which implies the unchanged resolution, i.e. the same grid points (or elements) per wavelength used.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A hope (not realized in this study) is that the k dependence of the error could be derived by this theory. See Ihlenburg [13] for a discussion of k dependence of error estimates for the related one-dimensional Helmholtz equation.…”
Section: Theorem 23 For H Sufficiently Small (Or For H 0 Sufficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Galerkin finite element method (FEM) for (1.2) in the one-dimensional case was first carried out in [8], where the well-posedness and error estimates of the Galerkin FEM were established under the condition k 2 h 1 using the Green's function and an argument due to Schatz [21]. A refined analysis for (1.2) in the one-dimensional case was performed in [18] (resp., [19]) for the h version (resp., hp version) of FEM, where the well-posedness and error estimates were established under the condition kh 1 using the discrete Green's functions. The proofs in these works rely heavily on the use of explicit forms of continuous and/or discrete Green's functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%