2018
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2017.2760840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-Set Model-Predictive Control Strategies for a 3L-NPC Inverter Operating With Fixed Switching Frequency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
147
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
147
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact of high computational requirement, the real-time implementation of predictive control for power converters is of considerable interest to improve the dynamic performance as well as to optimize the entire system performance by including additional constraints. MPC has been applied for two-level voltage source inverter (VSI) [5,6], three-level neutral-point clamped converter (NPC) [2,7], active front end rectifier [8,9], cascaded H-Bridge inverter [10][11][12], asymmetric flying capacitor converter [13], three-phase direct Matrix converters [14,15], predictive control for UPS applications [16,17], predictive torque control (PTC), and field oriented control (FOC) of an induction machine [2,18], to name a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the fact of high computational requirement, the real-time implementation of predictive control for power converters is of considerable interest to improve the dynamic performance as well as to optimize the entire system performance by including additional constraints. MPC has been applied for two-level voltage source inverter (VSI) [5,6], three-level neutral-point clamped converter (NPC) [2,7], active front end rectifier [8,9], cascaded H-Bridge inverter [10][11][12], asymmetric flying capacitor converter [13], three-phase direct Matrix converters [14,15], predictive control for UPS applications [16,17], predictive torque control (PTC), and field oriented control (FOC) of an induction machine [2,18], to name a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the cost function is formulated based on the stationary αβ co-ordinates [19,20]. Considering current control with FS-MPC, the sinusoidal future current references need to be predicted accurately using an extrapolation method, however, the extrapolated reference causes unwanted oscillations that influence the transient response [7,9,19]. Considering the above issue, the cost function can be designed using a rotating dq frame that does not require extrapolation method because of continuous current references [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is necessary to require a small sampling time to obtain a reasonable steady-state and good transient performances. To overcome these issues, various approaches have been developed such as using DPC established on extended-state observation with PWM [18], port-controlled Hamiltonian system [12], sliding mode control [19], and predictive control [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, it requires a high sampling frequency to achieve an acceptable steady-state and high dynamic performances. To deal with this disadvantage, several control approaches have been proposed such as using direct power control with space vector modulation [14], fuzzy control [15], sliding mode control [16], and predictive control [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%